I pretty much figured that out a long time ago. I can spot a ***** from a mile away. And given how badly I schooled you in every thread you've made, you posting a scorecard would lead to more humiliation for you as you well know by now. Source that the ring scored the fight for Froch? I havent seen one Froch fan post a scorecard yet. Again the humiliation factor. They know there guy look like crap, Froch pretty much went from a respected fighter to one of the most derided fighters on ESB. Every day there's a thread, not started by me about how crap Froch is. If Froch had actually won that fight his stock would have risen not fallen so drastically. thus why is fans cant defend the fact that he won. He gave the best an old fighter could give. And it was against Hatton so its not like he was in there with a true Hofer or anything. Infact if not for the illegal tactics I think Tszyu would've beaten Hatton even being as old and shot as he was. Dawson - 27 Ward - 26 Dirrell - 26 Alexander 23 Bradley - 26 Berto - 26 Williams - 28 Cloud - 28 Pavlik - 28 Donaire - 27 All rated at the top of their division or close two. 3 of which already rated in the P4P top 10 We also got young prospects like Mike Jones, Antwon Smith, Peter Quillin, Dontae Wilder and Fernando Guerrero who are just waiting to make their splash. Corrales wasnt horribly weight drained. He would go on to win another title at 130. How could he be weight drained if he won another title there. :rofl We know Tszyu was shot because he hadnt fought in a year. And somethign like once in 2 years. Thats a part time fighter. Sorry thats silly. Corrales was a great super featherweight and lightweight. The best of his era behind Floyd Mayweather. Not being an ATG fighter overall does mean that Corrales wasnt the best of his era at lightweight, he was, along with CAstillo. Frazier only attained true claim to the championship after he beat Ali. Dont see what you are struggling with this. Anyway, its in no way comparable to froch or Khan. Frazier had to go through eliminators to fight for the vacant title. Khan and Froch were merely ranked in line for the title, and thats mostly just politics. Khan had just been stopped, 2 fights later he was fighting for a title. Debateable. Whats not debateable is that Joe Louis had the longest and most impresive reign of any heavyweight ever. And nobody would rank Lennox even close to the Brown Bomber. Uhh Sugar Ray Leonard? :rofl Lets keep it to the "modern" era of boxng shall we. You know fighters whos careers began after the 19th century. You'd have been better naming Ted "Kid" Lewis. See above. Lets keep it to guys we actually can watch on film. As for Mayweather losing to Buchanan, nah, and Buchanan is not as great a fighter as either Toney or Mayweather. You're right. I mean Mayweathers reach deficit and height deficit would automatically give way to his amazing leaping ability at 160lbs. :rofl
The bottom line is the man has achieved someting millions of individuals never will. He can go to his grave knowing he held a WBC strap and beat some goddam good fighters so far. You cant call a man like that 'a fraud'. The dude is a 'force,' period
It would have been a travesty for the sport of boxing if Dirrell had of won a world title the way he fought.
Your really clutching at straws to think id lie about The Ring score and Boxing News score and im sure if your a bit of a fan you would know the truth and have read them. I havent checked any of your sources, ive no reason to disbelieve you. It just obviously bugs you that the so called bible of boxing scored for Froch over Dirrell . Why should I care if you respect me or not, you mean nothing to me. But why do you want me to watch the fight again to post a score card for you? Ive never claimed one beat the other, just it was a close fight, and that when 2 established boxing mags scored for Froch it can hardly be a robbery. 80% of people (not sure where you got that from, is that worldwide or just a random poll you have found) but not Boxing News or The Ring magazine, the publications that fans follow and get distributed worldwide. Im not sure why you are quoting Hatton when the topic is Froch. Must really be clutching at straws now. But funny how you are calling Jones shot after his first legit loss (only DQ loss at time) , when he got KOd as was deemed as unbeaten still, when Hatton (who im no fan of) had already been KOd and people were calling shot when he beat Lazcano, before he fought Pac. The same Pac the former flyweight who beat Americas Golden Boy who had fought as high as MW , while your mentioning it, by embarrassing one sided stoppage. :good
Anyone that Ko's Taylor cant be all that bad. Let alone decision a then undefeated Pascal who himself has gone on to win a strap. He's not the prettiest but sometimes thats effective. But its just a matter of time before his 0 goes (which I think Kessler will take), and once he losses his 0 I honestly dont see him being the same.