Carl Froch was right about Dirrell...

He's not the only ****er who felt like choking AD that night mate!!

 

Dirrell was acting like the chicken in the Rocky movie. Dirrell lost his arse.

 

Dirrell beat Abraham real bad and set Euro boxing back 50 years!!

 

Dirrell engaged enough to have Froch having the wobbles, as Lennox Lewis would say.

There is nothing in the rule book that says a fighter has to be aggressive.

Clean punching
EFFECTIVE aggression
DEFENSE
Ring Generalship

What dont Froch fans understand about the rules and how you score boxing matches?

 

What body shots did Froch land? What work in the clinch? Rabbit punches?

7 rounds for Froch. I think Froch got Willie Pep beat, it once said that Pep won a round not throwing a punch, well Froch won a fight not landing a punch. :rofl

 

Froch got knocked down and after that he ran, and then went down from a jab, faked a kockout, which the MRI proven. An MRI does not lie. Dirrell was acting because he had to, he knew he would not make it to the end. Dirrell's referee Cole was helping him with low blows, headbutt, which cause cut and the knockdown that Abraham scored. Dirrell grew feathers after that and went back to his chicken ways like when Froch kicked his arse.

 

You really are a disgusting xenophobe. Dirrell boxed beautifully for 3 rounds, the rest of the time he was ducking below the waste, taking a knee, turning his back, all of which are just as illegal as rabbit punches. But then Dirrell is a black American fighter, so it's okay for him to break the rules in your eyes. ****ing ridiculous. If he had actually boxed more instead of fighting like a ***** he would have won the fight clearly, no arguments. He didn't though, he spent too many rounds trying to avoid engaging and that is what cost him. Only his few deluded fans actually believe it was anything other than a dull fight that could have gone either way.

 

Yeah but Calzaghe sent American boxing back to the stone age

 

Also, the punchstats for Froch-Dirrell show Froch outlanding Dirrell by a decent margin. I don't really buy in to punchstats personally, but for anyone suggesting that it is literally impossible to give Froch the fight, it might be worth taking a look.

 

Then why did ring magazine, every journo in attendence and 3 foreign judges rule it for Froch?

 

You're a broken record, give it a break!

 

Rofl what punch stats? The only punch stats I saw of the fight were posted on youtube and had Dirrell massively ahead.

Kirk is scoring the fight right now. I think even he's having a revelation of how badly Froch was outclassed.


Again if you give Froch 7 rounds of that fight you cant score for ****. If you give him more then 4 you're pushing it.

 

Show me. I see this repeated by Froch fans all the time and I have yet to see anybody provide proof.

I do know that in polls on here and the British forum had Dirrell winning the fight.

Apparently not everyone is stupid.


Btw, if you want anymore proof the fix was in, the Italian judge gave Froch the 11th, a clear Dirrell round where he punished Froch for every punch he threw.

 

its a fact, michiganwarrior cant see it because hes a nuthugger, americans very own Ring had Froch winning!

 

a bit like UK fans defending Hatton in the Kostya Tszyu fight!