Cassius Clay vs Alex Miteff (How Much Did They Pay Alex To Take A Dive)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Senor Pepe', Oct 19, 2012.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,654
    Dec 31, 2009

    Alex was trying prety hard - why would he try and score a KO against the kid if he was having to make it last 6 rounds? Miteff was throwing bombs.

    I think miteff wanted out, clays anchor punch landed but alex either decided "I cant knock this kid out, so whats the point?" ...or it was a better punch than it looked on film. I still did not buy the drunken walk and the stoppage. I think things were prety even and alex deserved to continue. but he did not want to.
     
  2. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    48
    Mar 14, 2012
    Alex Miteff (some previous bouts)

    May 20, 1960 at Madison Square Garden

    Eddie Machen (32-2-1), battled evenly with Alex Miteff (23-5-1) over the first 3-Rounds,
    as both fighters fought an intense inside slug-gest early in this bout.

    The 25 year-old - 6' 1" 203 lb. - Alex Miteff, landed some hard hooks to Machen's body during
    the early rounds, which made the 6' 1" 190 lb. Machen whince several times.

    But, the experienced Machen started to take control in Round 4, by landing several crisp
    left hands to Alex Miteff's head.

    Machen took complete control of the bout in Round 6, and battered Miteff all over the ring
    with a two-fisted assault.

    During the second-half of the bout, Machen administered a bad beating upon the Argentinian's head.

    Alex who was hurt badly in Round 9, was just barely able to make it thru the round as he was
    reeling about on wobbling legs.

    Eddie Machen, realizing he had a hurt Miteff in front of him, took it easy on his over-matched
    opponent in the 'final round', and just boxed from long range with easy left jabs.

    The UPI scored the bout 8-1-1 in Rounds for Eddie Machen.

    Eddie Machen, 'I see no reason to hurt a fighter, who already is in bad-shape. I had
    the fight won, and knocking out Alex in the last round would have little importance.'

    Alex had received a 'bad-beating' by Eddie in this fight, and would not return to the
    ring for 5 1/2 months.
     
  3. BillB

    BillB Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,757
    40
    Jul 23, 2011
    Ali didn't have the Anchor Punch until just before his second bout with Liston.

    It was taught to him by Stepin Fetchit, who had learned it from Jack Johnson.

    This is what Ali said, and he did not lie ;)
     
  4. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    48
    Mar 14, 2012
    Bill B,

    Correct,

    The LSG Publicist was trying to 'coin a phrase' for each bout.

    Cassius Clay, was 'well marketed' and smartly moved.
     
  5. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    But we just saw it in the Miteff fight,or did we imagine it?
     
  6. BillB

    BillB Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,757
    40
    Jul 23, 2011

    You must have imagined it.

    Ali, himself said he had just learned the AP just before knocking Liston out with it. That was 1965.

    What you might have seen was the $10K punch or the rig- a -bout punch.
     
  7. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    48
    Mar 14, 2012
    Bill B,

    Another factor, Cassius was supposed to have 'loaded gloves' in the Alex Miteff
    fight.

    Supposedly the old horse hair packed gloves. After sitting around for awhile, they
    felt like concrete when they landed on your face.
     
  8. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,675
    Aug 18, 2012
    Such garbage. Product of a real sick mind.
     
  9. Lord Tywin

    Lord Tywin Guest

    Thats funny. Another example of Pepe not being able to get his story straight. So which is it? Was it a fix, Miteff being washed up, or did Ali have loaded gloves? Or is your thesis that it was a combination of all three. Ali was so bad after a sterling amateur career that he had to be protected against a faded Miteff, who was never that good anyway, by loading his gloves AND fixing the fight...

    Pepe/Duce needs to research the principle of Occam's razor before posting his garbage.
     
  10. Senor Pepe'

    Senor Pepe' Boxing Junkie banned

    9,408
    48
    Mar 14, 2012
    To insure a 'victory', you must cover all the bases.

    It was a Nationally Televised bout, so the fight had to look somewhat legitimate.

    Before this bout, the majority of the boxing writers were saying that Cassius
    'Had no Punch'.
     
  11. Lord Tywin

    Lord Tywin Guest

    Wow, so they really went all out on the conspiracy. This was better planned, and more well thought out than the JFK assassination.

    All to make sure a hot prospect didnt lose to a guy who had only won two of his last seven fights, would lose his next fight much the same way as he lost to Ali (only to a lesser fighter than Ali) only one month later and then retire for five years. Yup, makes perfect sense... If you are bat**** crazy, which you sir are.
     
  12. D9Garrard

    D9Garrard Active Member Full Member

    597
    41
    Oct 21, 2008
    Do you have anything to contribute to Pepe's threads instead of insults, Tywin?

    So far, all you've shown me is that you have the blind faith of a seven year old who still believes boxing was a completely pure sport and everything is exactly as it seems. Whether Pepe is correct in his research or not, he still contributes more in a week in his non-Ali/Duran threads than you have in your whole tenure here.

    If I remember correctly, you're the genius who believed Pipino Cuevas was barnstorming through Texas sparring with 15 year olds because he couldn't find "appropriate sparring" in L.A a week before a scheduled title defense. Brilliant.

    If you don't like his threads, then do the rest of us a favor and disappear from them in the future.
     
  13. Lord Tywin

    Lord Tywin Guest

    Correction: I was the one who argued that Pepe/Duce saying the sparring session never happened because there was no film of it was a weak argument at best. Below is my actual quote and you can see I made it clear that I wasnt supporting or denying the story itself:

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    Dont worry, you dont have to apologize, I'll just assume...


    We can argue the merits of what Pepe/Duce brings to this forum with his lies and supposition but the fact remains that it is a public forum, if Pepe continues to post his garbage he can expect to continue to get criticized for it by myself and others.

    I would suggest if you are such a fan of this revisionist tripe, and cant suffer its rebuttal then I suggest you two get a room together where you can agree on how nothing is boxing is what it seems.
     
  14. ron u.k.

    ron u.k. Boxing Addict banned

    4,920
    12
    Feb 14, 2006
    :-( Extraordinary
     
  15. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,519
    1,675
    Aug 18, 2012
    This is not revisionism....it's out and out lies without anything to back it up.