Cazaghe better than Floyd?

come on both a great fighters

 

Pacquiao was at the time the P4P number one fighter in boxing. Did you consider Thompson as being P4P, number 1 in the world or did you conveniently forget that Pac was ranked that high . not to mention thompson was koed right after the second eubank fight. comparing losses to pacquiao and to thopmson dosent help your argument much.

 

in you're opinion they're comparable. yeah you can find holes in mayweather's resume but if mayweather has big holes in his resume, then calzaghe has craters in his. if mayweather had calzaghe's resume, he would get more criticism then he does now.

 

what the hell does wieght have to do with it? you're trying to run from the fact that eubank past it and was done after losing two fight with thompson while hatton, having already regained the top spot at 140, was koed brutally by pac, a boxer who is regarded as the best in the world and a hof fighter.

 

now you're just making excuses. now ifs, ands and buts. what being discussed here is who has the better resume. and you still havent provided sensible argument to support your claim.

 

Corrales is not 1-2 with Casamayor. He was dominated and put on his ass by Casamayor. It was a robbery and the most dominant performance by Casamayor in their trilogy.
His win over Castillo was tainted by the spitting of the mouthpiece.

 

:-( you dont get it do you? pacquiao, regardless of what wieght he came up from, already proved he was a devastating at at higher wieghtclasses. so hatton, despite being considered the best man at 140 after being lazcano and malignaggi, got steamrolled because pac is that damn good. you even compaing thompson and pacquiao shows how desperate you are.

 

Really? I thought marquez and Oscar was born in 1973 smh :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

9 out of 10 people who is not an true boxing fan don't know Calzaghe lol 9 out of 10 people who is not a true boxing fan know who Mayweather is. So this is a stupid question man :-(