Chris Arreola weighed in at 234lbs!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ryanm8655, May 14, 2011.

  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Messages:
    46,399
    Likes Received:
    15
    He's gash.

    Too late to start being dedicated now, even getting down to 234 is a half-assed effort. He shouldn't be any more than 220.

    He had his shot against an almost shot Vitali Klitschko and turned up f'n huge before being banged up and stopped.... then was outpointed easily by Adamek who hardly got out of second gear.

    Now he's facing a man who was easily beaten by Antonio Tarver of all people.....
     
  2. KillerDeluxe

    KillerDeluxe Guest

    210 is too low for a guy like Arreola. Hes Mexican, and most Mexicans who weight over 175 are stocky...hence why you ever rarely see Mexicans above 147/154... 225 would be the perfect weight for Arreola...but with that low weight I'd figure his power decreases but has a increase in speed...

    Lets go Arreola, glad to see you put the donuts down but you can do better! Not complaing tho, 234 is a great start.
     
  3. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2007
    Messages:
    45,002
    Likes Received:
    4
    His power would be better if he weighed less. I've said this before and I'll stick by it...I can't remember a slow fighter that was a genuinely murderous puncher. Speed is crucial to power. George Foreman was the closest to this and even he was faster than Arreola.

    Can't say I'm interested in this fight, its a nothing contest.
     
  4. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2011
    Messages:
    19,099
    Likes Received:
    1
    :rofl
     
  5. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    10,798
    Likes Received:
    3
    You know, I really don't think Foreman was faster than Arreola. Foreman was comically slow.
     
  6. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    35,621
    Likes Received:
    12
    You're way to caught up on physical conditioning. That's not any indication of a fighters conditioning to perform.
    Arreola stands 6ft 3. At 234lbs that's quite lean for a man his size. There's no guarantee's whatsoever that he'll perform better down at 210. Certainly at 234lbs that's a great plus from his usual flabby 250lb nonsense. But that man's a heavyweight. Unless he develops the skills to compliment his conditioning whatever weight he comes in at is academic. As the reality is Arreola is just a slugger. And a crude one at that.
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    279
    Not if he doesn't have much muscle, which he doesn't, Arreola is certainly not to be mistaken for lean :lol:

    As for skills, he's actually got a decent skill set by modern big men standards
     
  8. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,255
    Likes Received:
    134
    234 is not lean at all for someone who supposedly stands at 6'3. (No chance he is 6'3. I'm 6'4 and I weigh around 230 these days, as I've stopped doing any excercise, and I don't look any where close to the state he turns up to fight in.
     
  9. roe

    roe Guest

    Arreolla.. lean? :rofl
     
  10. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    35,621
    Likes Received:
    12
    That's YOUR subjective opinion which frankly means squat. The reality is Arreola is a BIG man and a heavyweight end of story. Comparatively with his previous highs of 260 plus absolutely he is lean. You can see it clearly in his face.
    To be honest the forum opinions on here on what constitutes a optimal criteria regarding weight have to be taken with a pinch of salt. As 90% of the forum posters here have never trained a day in their life and know nothing about conditioning.
     
  11. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2004
    Messages:
    37,070
    Likes Received:
    29
    He is probably less than 210. He is carrying more fat then you can believe. I'm a relatively slim guy but I've 2 stone on me that I could shift easy but others with think I could only lose 3 or 4 kg. Arreola eats terribly. If he had 3 good meals or 6 smaller meals the weight would fly off. He is just too weak mentally when it comes to food. He is okay but he simply isn't 100% serious about making money and a legacy.
     
  12. ant-man

    ant-man ant Full Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    6,254
    Likes Received:
    1
    He's fat mate.

    Fat.
     
  13. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2010
    Messages:
    20,730
    Likes Received:
    1
    Scurla is ****ing weird about fighters and their body sizes.
     
  14. Flash Jab

    Flash Jab Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    12,335
    Likes Received:
    0
    Enough with the pats on the back, cut it ****ing down more, Chris. It doesn't take 4 or 5 fights to go from fat to skinny.
     
  15. RoosterC

    RoosterC Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,242
    Likes Received:
    8
    First off he is not 6'4'' he is 6'2'' and he does not need to be ripped, he just needs to be in shape. Chris needs to drop 20lbs more fat so 215lbs at best.

    Anyone can be ripped, it is not like it is some genetic gift, it is simply a great diet and takes dedication. That said Chris if he were ripped would be 190lbs and no one is asking that of him.