Clinching

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ocelot, Jan 30, 2008.

  1. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    All on the topic of homo clinching, and it's finest exponents
     
  2. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    It was a veiled way to stick the boot into Hopkins as usual.
     
  3. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    That's because his is classed as ring generalship, unlike Ruiz or Hatton

    I take the point his actual boxing is better, but it's cheating all the same
     
  4. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    The fundamental difference is Ruiz & Hatton have styles based around clinching where as Hopkins uses it as part of his style when necessary. A Hatton or Ruiz attack will inevitably end in a clinch whereas with Hopkins that is not always the case.
     
  5. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Semantics...

    Most boxers clinch, but for me there is a certain point at which it starts to get annoying as ****. All of them pass it with flying colours. They all use it for precisely the same reasons, they are all some of the biggest cheats around

    Cheating cnuts the lot of em
     
  6. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    14,302
    Likes Received:
    0
  7. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    14,302
    Likes Received:
    0
  8. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Yes, it started to become more prevelant as he stepped up the competition. He was really exciting as an upcomer

    Another explanation could be all those pints he's downing. He doesn't have the gas he once did, so he clings on for dear life
     
  9. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Just because you keep saying it's cheating doesn't make it true. It may annoy & anger you but it's not against the rules unless it's excessive. Hopkins will clinch Joe, possibly a lot, so get used to it.:good
     
  10. dan-b

    dan-b Guest

    Indeed he did far less clinching when he was fighting people he could get away with standing off from in between attacks.

    :good
     
  11. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    12,558
    Likes Received:
    6
    I would be so pleased if someone steps up and invokes one boxing rule that rationally gives reason to penalize one given fighter for frequent clinches - and keep in mind it can't be inactivity b.c. others have had more inactive performances without clinching in boxing history.
     
  12. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Messages:
    5,846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ruiz, Hatton and Klitschko
     
  13. MacManJr.

    MacManJr. Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2007
    Messages:
    5,111
    Likes Received:
    6
    Wlad. All he does since he got with Emmanuel is jab, jab, cross, clinch. I don't remember the last time I saw him throw a hook and you can completely forget about an uppercut! He is still fun to watch though just because his 1-2 is so powerful.
     
  14. Dorfmeister

    Dorfmeister Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2007
    Messages:
    12,558
    Likes Received:
    6
    Were Hatton, Ruiz or Klitschko ever penalised for use of that tactic? And what were the referee's or analysts' explanations for that reason?
     
  15. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2005
    Messages:
    31,820
    Likes Received:
    3,029
    Helps if you have the power of Don King behind you to get that curiously hands off attitude from the officials.

    Notice how Ruiz has largely abandoned his excessive holding since King dropped him??

    It's no coincidence. And it's also no coincidence he hasn't "beaten" a decent fighter since.