Common misconception about Floyd not fighting in rhythm........

Popkins, I have said before, not just in this thread, in the other thread, that Manny has a chance, just that I personally dont think he will win, however you will keep asserting this point, simply because you can handle my opinion, why, because ironically, im not the biased one here.

See above.

I dont think I have ever said he has no chance, not in this thread, or my other, just that I have been over this fight in my head time and again, and unfortunately, I personally dont think Pac is going to win.


Im open to discussing anything, only you seemingly dont want to debate anything, you just seem to want to throw around accusations of being biased (which is ironic), as you dont seem to want to go through anything point by point, which im fully prepared to do, so how am I not prepared to discuss the possibility's? why do you think there were so many civil Pac/May fans in that other thread if I was being so overly biased?

Face it Popkins, you just cant handle my opinion, which is why you have not even attempted to debate my opinion, you will just claim, oh, I cant be bothered etc etc, when infact, we both know the real reason you dont want to get it.

 

Maybe having the same discussion and making the same points and forcing the same agenda over and over and over again doesn't bore you, but it certainly bores me.

I believe Pacquiao will outpoint Mayweather, but I wouldn't be surprised if it ended up the other way because it's an evenly-matched fight. You may say you are open to discussion, but from reading your threads I know this is not true. All you do is continually ram your agenda down peoples' throats, you are not open the way that Lefthook and PowerPuncher showed they were on this thread... and I can guarantee both would bet money on Floyd to win.

Keep going with your agenda then, but very shortly many more people will become as tired of your cheerleading as I am.

 

First off, I have made two threads regarding this, although it would HAVE be an inordinate amount of times wouldn't it? that helps you make the assertion im biased doesn't it? it also distances you from being a biased Pacquiao die hard.

I dont think its a non event, but I do think Floyd will win clearly, now I think the fight will look! more competitive than it is when the cards are tallied up, but that Mayweather will have won majority of the rounds.

As I said before, a point you seemed to gloss over to make your assertions, excuse your biased, this thread was made as someone suggested Mayweather's rhythm count not be timed, which is something I have heard said before, not just on here, so I decided to address that particular point, as I dont think you have to time him per say, only that point lead me into why I did'nt think Manny would win, I guess if I knew you were going to flame my thread, destroy it, I wouldn't of said it, then again, you dont think of peoples insecurities when discussing Boxing on a forum.

 

probally not at 147
for anything close need be a Disater of a fight and a defensive break down with a TKO I dont see manny KO nobody at 147

 

You can keep having a go at me all you want, getting all defensive, but I think that shows that you know you have been called right here. You are always forcing your agenda every time I see you post, and your reaction tells me you realize this.

 

Well as I said, the point of the thread was not in relation to the Manny fight, although I guess I went off on a tangent there, as what I said lead my thinking into that, as it seemed to tie into that, that said, here is a thought, dont respond to my thread if you find it boring, but you cant do that can you? your too biased to leave it alone, so what you will do is, not discuss anything, but project your biased onto me, make out IM! being biased.

You dont, just that cant bring up valid points to address mine, so will get pissy and claim there is no talking to me as im biased. If I were saying Manny is going to win, here's why, I would'nt be biased in your eyes, and you would be c-signing everything I said.

I dont have an agenda, and I think anyone with a degree of perception, can see that im willing to discuss the matter, that I wont throw accusations around, or abuse them to make my point, that said, if what I say annoys you as much as it seemingly does, then im glad, as you have proven yourself to be extremely biased fan, infact it fans like you, that destroy good debates on forums like this, why there are so many trolls, so much bickering.


Irony is, all this thread will have done, is display how biased you are to everyone else on the forum.

 

Oh god!

So now your using reverse psychology to project your biased on me, now im getting angry/defensive which portrays my biased?

 

All this thread will have shown is how hot and bothered you get when you are called on your agenda, because it's you who is writing lengthy posts and getting all steamed up. Another clear sign that you are aware that your cover has been blown.


This is the crux of this matter:

- I believe Mayweather has a very live chance in this fight, even though I thoroughly dislike his public persona and believe he is collectively overrated as a fighter

- You claim to be a Pacquiao fan, and yet staunchly refuse to acknowledge that he even has any chance at all in this fight


Who is the biased one? :smoke

 

I think you should consult a dictionary on the use of the word 'bias'.

 

PBF/ Pac threads are annoying...really are.

 

Nah, I didn't expect you to respond to this.

From now on, maybe you should change the record a bit, stop preaching, stop forcing your agenda, and be a little more open. Then you wouldn't leave yourself open for flamings.

 

Hot and bothered? You have no self awareness do you? all you have done since coming into this thread, and! my other thread, is come across pissy, sarcastic, and annoyed at that opinions I hold, only you have not debated a single! thing in this thread, because apparently! its boring, only here you are on the 4th page and you have said what? absolutely nothing to address any of my points. I aint steamed up, if I were, maybe I would be swearing, maybe I would be trying not to debate the actual issues like you, maybe I would be trying to navigate my way around those issues and assert someone is biased instead? only as I have said, im open to debate, also, writing lengthy posts is because I can address any point you make, only you seem to leave out stuff I have already said, like when you made the assertion, im categorically giving Manny no chance, when I have said numerous times, in this thread, in the other, that I think Manny can! win, only I keep having to make the same points cause you keep reiterating the same assertions, despite evidence to the contrary. I thought I would be able to have a debate with you despite the shaky start, bring you around to the realization im not being biased in regards to this thread, which is why I told how I came to make this thread, but you seemingly dont want to debate cause you have nothing to say, only that im biased.

I wouldn't say im particularly a Pacquiao fan, im easy to be honest, I like watching him fight, he is a great guy, but he nor Floyd, are my favourite fighters to watch.

How many times do I have to say this? I have said time and again, I think Manny can win, just that I dont think he will, have I not said that, so why do you keep making the same point?



Crux of the matter is, you cant handle my opinion, its that simple.

 

Dont flame the thread more son, please!

 

Yep, I agree with your view on inactivity. Manny's fighting twice a year so it would affect him way less than Floyd who fights just once. It would be interesting to put a '10 Pacquiao against a '07 Floyd. Floyd's speed isn't what it was then and that's why I bring it up.

 

How did it go from the original topic to popkins trying to be special because he believes he isn't biased at all:nut