Dude, I thought Corrales was going to win. Corrales was so explosive yet composed in the ring, I really thought he was going to walk right through Mayweather. But the facts are he had these MAJOR legal problems infron of him too. Imagine having to go in and out of court almost daily, your family is falling apart, AND you know you're about to sevre some HARD time in a CALIFORNIA PRISON right before a huge fight.
Another truly ignorant post. If you were wearing your glasses you would see that I said I didnt even post that, then a few posts down I posted the full quotation from the person who said it. Another person who reads the opening post and then mouths off. So quick to defend your boy.
We all know you have an axe to grind here and you're not fooling anyone. You hate PBF. If not then why start the thread as a way to try and discredit the win?:deal
haha clueless once again you didnt read any of the other posts in this thread because I then said to executioner
given the convoluted history of boxing in general, I think we as fans tend to question dominant victories over fighters who were expected to give close fights or favored to win we tend to think there is a external factor
You can regulally find me schooling *******s and dishing out the pain on Pacquiao but not pbf my friend.
i like how mayweather will take on a "Threat" .. that's about to go to ****ing jail for a few years..but he won't go anywhere near a "b level fighter" ..in cotto ..or a shane mosley because they aren't in his range
you seldom see a performance like that because usually both fighters are 100%. if you really believe that that was the best chico who showed up that night then maybe it's you who can't see past floyds nut hairs. you have all this boxing knowledge and have no clue as to how to apply it. its ok to say floyd had an off night against castillo the first time but no one else could possibly have an off night against floyd? take a look at the whole picture and use that vast knowledge you like to claim and see if a guy like chico at 100% is unable to perform as well as a baldomir or a castillo or judha, no? i guess chico was just a complete fraud who floyd exposed.
I remember the distractions and I believe he was having trouble with the weight also. This is how I felt then and now. I did not know who was going to win and it was one of those fights I wish did not happen due to liking both fighters and the "0" was going to go for one of them. Chico was destroying opponents and for him to take this fight and get dropped ten times? Something was wrong. I take nothing away from PBF's permormance and he shined. Looking at it again, I could not see Chico beating PBF even at 100%, but for that night, there was something wrong. "Chico your diffinitely going to prison and I don't know for how long so have a great fight". Come on now, that wouldn't give anyone a bad focused fight?
Chico wasn't a fraud. With that said I unlike you can see huge styles advantage PBF had in that fight. That's why I say he beats him 10/10 times. Chico would lose wheter he was 100% focused or 50% the outcome would be the same a PBF win. PBF was injured going into the fight with JLC ad still won while as you claim Chico was distracted going into the PBF fight and was schooled big difference there.:deal
Basically it breaks down to this. Pimp C had "sexual relations" with PBF and the Chico win was a great win against a guy that wasn't 100%, but likely would have lost anyway.