Corrie Sanders, Lamon Brewster and Ross Purrity....

[url]http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/006/692/i02/ig66-tut-face-02.jpg?1296087295[/url]

Arthur Abraham was descended from King Tut. This is indisputable.

[url]http://assets.sbnation.com/imported_assets/26888/340x.jpg[/url]

 

This thread back fired.

And lol at mongoose for making nay sayer angry.

 

white man was created by black scientist yakub..undeniable truth

 

But who created the Aliens that ruled Egypt?

[url]http://projectavalon.net/forum4/attachment.php?attachmentid=12495&d=1325951805[/url]

This is not a white or black man's skull. This is a freak. Tut was also determined to have female characteristics, did he have both ***ual organs? We don't know, but it is undeniable that it is a possibility?


King Tut, his father Atkenaton, Nefertiti they all had elongated skulls. not just in paintings. but in the artwork of them, and even the mummy of King Tut had a elongated Skull.
Modern science wants us to believe they placed boards on their heads as infant, but the volume would be the same..the volume of these skulls are larger. Thus that theory has a large hole in it. But yet most people in the science world stick to that 'theory'. if a baby is deformed by boards..the skulls volume would still be the same as when he grows up, yet these findings like Tut his volume of his skull was larger. Thus Cranial deformation I don't buy into with many skulls found.
We find elongated skull all over the world, in places like South America to Egypt,and Russia. Who were these people? And why is no-one today born with these skulls? Were they even human?

 

skull cranial deformation was very popular those times,even in india today exist

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_cranial_deformation[/url]

 

This has been disproven on Ancient Aliens. And no mention as to why the anthropologists first thought the skeleton was female until they were told it was Tut? He was a hermie no doubt.


Modern science wants us to believe they placed boards on their heads as infant, but the volume would be the same..the volume of these skulls are larger. Thus that theory has a large hole in it. But yet most people in the science world stick to that 'theory'. if a baby is deformed by boards..the skulls volume would still be the same as when he grows up, yet these findings like Tut his volume of his skull was larger. Thus Cranial deformation I don't buy into with many skulls found.
We find elongated skull all over the world, in places like South America to Egypt,and Russia. Who were these people? And why is no-one today born with these skulls? Were they even human

 

It is you who is on the Crackpipe of denial.

Arthur Abraham bares a striking resemblance to your Ancient Tranny Alien Overlord.

 

yup..undeniably Arthur is a direct line descendant of the "Big Tranny"
rank 9 by boxrec

 

I wander if the "Big Tranny" would also be out boxed so easily by Froch?

 

For the last time, I'm not your daddy.

 

What does Corrie Sanders, Lamon Brewster, and Purrity have in common..

All three were seen leaving Nay_Sayer's mommy's house on the night he was conceived.

 

i wonder how much she charge them