Corrie Sanders Vs Michael Spinks

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Guru88, Dec 17, 2020.


  1. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,728
    17,776
    Apr 3, 2012
    Are there any fast handed 6’4 235 pound southpaws on Spinks’ resume to gauge how he’d do against a guy like Sanders?
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  2. sauhund II

    sauhund II Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    2,204
    Nov 8, 2008
    Again, we agree to disagree, sanders has the ability but only showed it once vs Spinks who operated at a higher level through out his career.

    You pick sanders, fine by me.
     
  3. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,011
    863
    Jul 30, 2010
    T-rex is Corey
     
  4. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,746
    4,491
    Jul 14, 2009
    he is still the more accomplished and skilled fighter
     
  5. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,728
    17,776
    Apr 3, 2012
    He was also smaller and possessed significantly less power and chin (at heavyweight). And he might even have been slower. Corrie pantsing Wlad can be easily argued as a more impressive win than anything Spinks has at heavyweight too.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,714
    46,383
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is all fine and good... but 90% of his career was at light heavy. At heavyweight, the Anything Can Happen axiom of boxing grows a 1000%.

    It's not so much if Sanders can land a lucky punch, rather it is if he can steal the momentum early. He threw punches in bunches and tended to overwhelm his victims rather than coldcokk them. If he gets Mike on a roll, I don't think it stops until the ref intervenes on Corrie's behalf. The question is, does Mike have the skill, temperament and physicality to not get caught in the whirlwind?

    Against a prime and focused Sanders (which didn't often materialize), honestly, I do not know.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  7. El Gallo Negro

    El Gallo Negro Active Member banned Full Member

    1,266
    1,277
    Nov 8, 2020
    theres two, ones a black guy the others a white guy
     
  8. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,833
    6,602
    Dec 10, 2014
    Spinks UD.

    He would use angles and flurries to outhustle the fast and powerfull but straight ahead and poorly conditioned (usually) Sanders.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2020
    Toney F*** U likes this.
  9. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,833
    6,602
    Dec 10, 2014
    Spinks is simply more talented and smarter than any of those guys. He used proper nutrition and conditioning to bulk up to 215. He also moved well and knew how to execute a solid game plan to suit the opponent.

    I actually think Sanders would have a better chance against a version of Holyfield who liked to trade than the very high ring IQ Spinks.

    After Spinks survives early he dominates late.
     
    Toney F*** U likes this.
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,771
    81,100
    Aug 21, 2012
    I really have to learn to edit and put together a video displaying Sanders' boxing ability. At his best he was anything but basic and straight ahead and he had good mobility and stamina.
     
    Seamus likes this.