Cotto better than Kessler??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sonny73, Aug 12, 2007.


  1. Jinx

    Jinx Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    0
    Aug 18, 2004
    Cotto's resume right now looks much better than Kessler's...but a win over Slapzaghe should bump Kessler over Cotto...
     
  2. jecxbox

    jecxbox St. Brett Full Member

    7,608
    3
    Aug 5, 2007
    agreed. :good...Belts don't mean **** anyways..Cotto has faced exellent B+ level fighters and manhandled them.

    Cottos 30-0 record has great opposition and he has already fought many different styles and has gotten past them all.

    This content is protected
    Top
    This content is protected
     
  3. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    I agree, I think if u can do it in more than 1 weight it shows p4p quality.
     
  4. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Could we shut this thread down

    This has to be one of the most ridiculous threads I read in a while. To even think one would rank Kessler over Cotto would be close to blasphamy.....if Kessler was to beat Calzaghe then we could discuss this but until then his name should not be mentioned in the same sentence as Cotto. Sorry but this is more fact than opinion.
     
  5. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Cotto's resume is only marginally better. Zab is slightly better than anyone Kessler has faced. Quintana etc... are no better than fighters like Mundine, Beyer and Siaca in all seriousness. Quintana is simply better known in America.

    Resumes won't change the fact Kessler is the superior fighter.
     
  6. UndisputedUK

    UndisputedUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,152
    1
    Feb 20, 2006
    :patsch Pinto? Quintana ? WTF are they? :yep
     
  7. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Neither one of them were beltholders
     
  8. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    I don't get it how has Kessler shown he is the better fighter? please elaborate?

    Cotto has the overall edge in boxing ability when comparing P4p what can Kessler do physically that Cotto can't?

    Cotto is a much better inside fighter cuts off the ring better and attacks the body in a much more effective manner. For example a fighter who rarely used his legs and stayed in the pocket all night for Kessler (Libarade) was able to finish the fight, a fighter of that caliber would have been brutally stopped around the 9th round against Cotto his body work would have halted a fighter of that level.
     
  9. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005
    Cotto and Kessler are close in terms of pound for pound status.

    In terms of competition, Cotto slightly edges Kessler.

    Pound for pound matchup, I'd lean towards Kessler.
     
  10. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    You can say the same for Kessler's record.

    Listen I think Kessler's a solid fighter with great tools but he's no Cotto at this point, your also talking about a weight class that's is filled with a lot less talent than WW, or JrWW for that matter (Not the current version of JrWW though)
     
  11. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Fair enough

    What seperates them in my opinoin in Cotto's ability to cut off the ring and his body work, Kessler has good fundementals but Cotto has shown he can work fighters from the outside as well, countering and using his jab. Overall I think Cotto is more versitial.
     
  12. Astola

    Astola Its a fact. Full Member

    1,839
    0
    Jan 6, 2007

    Ive been following both fighters pretty close and I am convinced that a p4p matchup would be to Kesslers advantage.

    Cotto's resume is better than Kessler's, but overall I strongly think that Kessler is both more versatile, adaptive and technically more sound = the better fighter.

    Cotto is a superb pressure fighter with extreme pop that breaks ribs. His fundamentals are very good but not perfect. He is so fascinating because of the extreme bodyshots and the enourmous pressure he puts to the ring.


    On the other hand:
    Kessler is a very smart technically almost flawless fighter that takes away his opponent without being hurt himself(!).

    Kessler would thrash Cotto in a p4p matchup. Keep Cotto at a distance untill Cotto quits in the corner.No doubt in my mind.
     
  13. King Dan

    King Dan Golovkin Full Member

    3,589
    1
    Feb 24, 2005


    I'm a huge Cotto fan and I actually agree with this assessment.
    Although "thrash" might be a little harsh.
     
  14. Astola

    Astola Its a fact. Full Member

    1,839
    0
    Jan 6, 2007

    I know its harsh but in this matchup I dont give Cotto many chances...

    It would be pretty onesided:deal
     
  15. mc50341

    mc50341 Member Full Member

    102
    0
    Jun 27, 2007


    I am wondering, what the heck have fighters like Corley, Torres, Quintana, Maussa, Baily, Urkal etc achieved since you rate them better than Siaca, Lucas, Mundine, Beyer and Andrade?

    Cotto won a late win against Judah (who by the way have not won one single fight worth mention in over two years) and now everybody see him as some divine gift to boxing. We will know much more when he enters the ring next time together with Mosley.

    I do not think you can compare Kessler and Cotto yet, they are both great fighter and still rising stars.