Could GGG become bigger BHOP??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by timeout, Jul 5, 2016.


  1. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,677
    29,224
    Feb 25, 2015
  2. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,677
    29,224
    Feb 25, 2015
    http://www.historiadelboxeo.com/articulos/Bernard52.jpg

    Look at the ****ing size difference. I mean FFS guys. Hopkins looks like he's toying with his kid brother here. That man is one big ass dude compared to Tito.

    That's what I mean. We're talking a Middleweight here vs a Welterweight.
     
  3. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,013
    10,041
    Oct 1, 2011
    He fought Trinidad because of the tournament King put together! It could have been Joppy instead of FT!
     
  4. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,013
    10,041
    Oct 1, 2011
    It's funny how you 3G fans hate when people criticize G's resume but, turn right around and try to destroy Hopkins resume to justify saying that G is/was better than Hops. Again! there is nobody on G's resume that comes close to Hagler or Hopkins! These are facts! You cannot argue the point! Until G beats somebody close to the caliber of Hopkins or Hagler, please shut up with all this crazy talk!
     
  5. Richmondpete

    Richmondpete Real fighters do road work Full Member

    7,140
    5,026
    Oct 22, 2015
    Lol you couldn't have used a worse picture to illustrate their relative sizes
     
  6. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,677
    29,224
    Feb 25, 2015
    I don't hate when people criticize Golovkin's resume. It could use some work.

    And Bernard Hopkins has the most overrated resume in a long time.

    Why didn't Hopkins beat somebody close to the caliber of Hagler then?

    Whenever Hopkins fought an elite fighter in their prime who wasn't small he got his ass kicked.
     
  7. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,677
    29,224
    Feb 25, 2015
    It's perfect. It shows the softness of Tito's body at 160. It shows the height disparity. It shows the disparity in the thickness of their cores, their clavicles, arms, etc.
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    If you think that Tito was a WW you really dksab and obvious that you weren't following boxing back then.
     
  9. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,043
    Jan 22, 2015
    :patsch My goodness.
     
  10. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,677
    29,224
    Feb 25, 2015
    He was a blown up Welterweight. His body is noticeable softer at 160 than 147.
     
  11. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,043
    Jan 22, 2015
    He admitted he doesn't watch boxing live. He watches fights on youtube, so he really doesn't know the backdrop on anything.
     
  12. drenlou

    drenlou VIP Member

    75,527
    40,043
    Jan 22, 2015
    :patsch:patsch x2
     
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    You mean he wasn't cutting 15+ pounds?
     
  14. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,677
    29,224
    Feb 25, 2015
    I'm an HBO, Showtime, ESPN, FS1, etc. subscriber now. I'm watching the big fights live here.
     
  15. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,677
    29,224
    Feb 25, 2015
    So? Cutting 15 pounds at Welterweight is normal now.