Tito was much more cut at 147. His natural weight class. http://cache4.asset-cache.net/gc/15...22zFnJAQFDTSIt/qQFESGcXC9FHuw6g9C+0sYcgpJuA==
http://www.historiadelboxeo.com/articulos/Bernard52.jpg Look at the ****ing size difference. I mean FFS guys. Hopkins looks like he's toying with his kid brother here. That man is one big ass dude compared to Tito. That's what I mean. We're talking a Middleweight here vs a Welterweight.
He fought Trinidad because of the tournament King put together! It could have been Joppy instead of FT!
It's funny how you 3G fans hate when people criticize G's resume but, turn right around and try to destroy Hopkins resume to justify saying that G is/was better than Hops. Again! there is nobody on G's resume that comes close to Hagler or Hopkins! These are facts! You cannot argue the point! Until G beats somebody close to the caliber of Hopkins or Hagler, please shut up with all this crazy talk!
I don't hate when people criticize Golovkin's resume. It could use some work. And Bernard Hopkins has the most overrated resume in a long time. Why didn't Hopkins beat somebody close to the caliber of Hagler then? Whenever Hopkins fought an elite fighter in their prime who wasn't small he got his ass kicked.
It's perfect. It shows the softness of Tito's body at 160. It shows the height disparity. It shows the disparity in the thickness of their cores, their clavicles, arms, etc.
If you think that Tito was a WW you really dksab and obvious that you weren't following boxing back then.
He admitted he doesn't watch boxing live. He watches fights on youtube, so he really doesn't know the backdrop on anything.