Could Hearns have ever beat Hagler?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 80s champs, Apr 10, 2009.


  1. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    There was absolutely nothing controversial about Haglar's loss to Willy Monroe.
     
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,027
    5,553
    Oct 5, 2009
    Maybe but a lot would have to work in Hearns favor

    Like had he not broke his hand

    also Hagler with the big cut had to be extra aggressive or he would have lost via TKO

    with out the cut Hagler may fight less desperate and Hearns may have stood more of a chance
     
  3. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    79
    Sep 3, 2007
    Depends when they fought, I dont see Hagler outboxing Tommy over the distance so my prediction would have to be Hearns on points or Hagler by very late stoppage.

    As I said, it would depend on which year they fought & the circumstances before & during the fight... I heard Hearns broke his hand in 1985, that certainly puts a whole new perspective on things if true.
     
  4. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,216
    9,434
    Jul 28, 2009
    People make far too much out of Tommy's chin. Look at the men who stopped him, then take under consideration that he would go on to go the distance with two out of the three that legitimately did so afterward. He fought nearly 70 fights over how many weight classes and about thirty ****ing years, with some damn tough competition and he was legitimately stopped 3 times. "Oh, that chin will always let poor Tommy down, I tell you!" Every time, without fail, I swear.
     
  5. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,247
    Feb 6, 2009
    you're right mate.
     
  6. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,937
    Nov 21, 2009
    you're right. you know jimmy jacobs picked mugabi to beat hag. because hag was getting hit so much. he said while the hearns fight was exciting, look how much hag got hit. the fact is that after duran, the prime hag was over and he became after roldan primarily a puncher and that is NOT what he was at all in his prime.:viking
     
  7. heehoo

    heehoo TIMEXICAH! Full Member

    3,763
    13
    Feb 16, 2008
    No.

    Hagler would have taken Hearns' right hand every time, shake it off, and come back to flatten Hearns every time.

    Bad fight for the Hitman every time.
     
  8. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Accurate post, but let me expand on it a bit. At 147 Tommy had skinny little bird legs. In the Leonard fight his legs betrayed him, and he could not get out of the way. So, one of the stoppage losses had little to do with Tommy's chin.
     
  9. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    76
    Jan 21, 2006
    There is nothing to be said beyond this. Hearns never showed he could beat Hagler at middleweight. Hagler was stunned in the first, not hurt. They are different.

    Broken hand or not, Marvin always makes it out of the first few rounds, and like he always does against great fighters who brought it, Hearns falls apart late and gets whacked.
     
  10. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    344
    Jul 13, 2007
    Excellent post as usual...Agree with all counts. Especially the part about Hagler being a miserable *******...Bad man that Hagler.