Crawford or Lomachenko?

Proof or STFU.

 

LMAO

Did your new EE hero not take a LOSS to Orlando Salido which still has yet to be avenged? Or did I just make it all up?

 

I don't know why you keep bringing up the Salido fight.

I doubt Crawford would have been able to beat Salido in his 2nd pro fight either.

 

Crawford would have absolutely CLOWNED Salido. This whole notion that Lomachenko is somehow on Crawford's level is beyond ridiculous. Loma, while being a damn good fighter, still has LOTS to prove...

 

He became a 2 weight world champion in less than 10 fights. What else does he need to prove?

 

All fights Crawford won. Meanwhile, Salido took a decision over Loma...

 

Good Lord above you are dense aren't you.

Where did I say he never?

2nd pro fight against a grizzled veteran, who weighed in as a welterweight and proceeded to low blow throughout with impunity yet still nearly got stopped in the last round.

Yet it is Lomo who is pushing for the rematch whilst Salido is looking to avoid.

Yes Lomo should really hang his head in shame.

List me all the fighters who challenged for a title in their second and was a champion in the third fights.....I'll say no more.

 

Yes, Crawford won. But he was losing for the first couple of rounds.

 

That he can beat the likes of Orlando Salido...

 

Anyone who thinks that Crawford is a better pure boxer than Lomachenko should stop watching boxing period. They're technically on two different levels.

 

Well **** my old boots I never knew that.....

 

Well he destroyed Salido's daddy in Martinez.

 

Lomachenko is the better pure boxer. Crawford was getting outboxed by Gamboa.

 

Why does it matter? Lomachenko's a better fighter now than he was at the time he fought Salido.

 

This is a Crawford or Loma thread. You don't speak for the minority or majority clown. You speak for yourself lol. This isnt a factual question lol... How Loma started out has no bearing on anything that we are talking about because he still lost to Salido.