Crawford or Lomachenko?

Is Loma a lineal champion? He was never a champion he's just a titlist. Crawford is a lineal champion in two divisions. He beat the man who beat the man or the champ who vacated. And you're the one clinging to the 7th fight thingy.

 

He beat Lopez twice and has given every fighter a rough outing.

Molina was a jobber when he faced Matthysse now all of a sudden he's some quality fighter.

 

LOL his top 3 wins are a undersized Gamboa, Postol (good win) and Ricky ****ing Burns.

His resume is paper thin.

 

Lopez was never an elite fighter. Ever!

 

Gamboa beat Salido lol...!!!
Lmfao. He's dissing Crawfords comp lmao... He's mad lol...!!!

 

Postol beat Matthysse and Gamboa beat Salido lol... #Dafuq

 

I know at 126 which was Gamboa's best weight. I said Crawford beat an undersized Gamboa, they fought at 135.

As for Lopez that lone win for Salido trumps any lone win for Crawford.

 

Who mentioned Postol beating Matthysse idiot? And what has it got to do with this thread?

 

And Crawford has never beaten an elite fighter. EVER!.

 

LoMo says he is moving up to 135 so that's a good thing, if he actually does it.

 

I would really love to see how Lomachenko fared against Gamboa.

 

Would of been a great fight.

Gamboa is the biggest waste of talent and mismanagement of recent years. His career is one prospects should look at in the way not to do it.

 

Mind your own business Gimp C.