Crawford vs Postol on PPV, would you buy it?

:good Thanks

 

Gotcha...:good

 

I'd like to see it, but it isn't PPV worthy. Not many PPV's as of late have been though.

 

People sat PPV should be reserved for good fights that change the landscape of the division but when a PPV fight like that gets offered people won't buy it because now they think the fighters have to be popular.


Which is it?

 

Neither good fights alone nor popular fighters are sufficient for a worthwhile PPV. The format should be reserved for either stars in good fights or a plethora of good fights from lesser known guys.

I'm not even sure Postol is the opponent for this one since the initial rumored opponent was someone as weak as Provodnikov and Arum was trying to get Postol another fight. That would be strikes 1 and 2 alone right there, but add in the fact that Arum notoriously doesn't give a damn about undercards and you have a largely unappealing card to have to pay for.

 

I don't like PPV as a whole, but I can live with it's purpose how it was used in the beginning, and that was superfights!
Only then, if you have to pay both top class boxers a lot of money to jump in the ring together, covering those costs for a fight everyone wants to see.
If you then charge a $30, $40 or even $50 fee, based on the size of the event, I'm fine with it.
Not $80 to see a boring mismatch between Flodypants and Andre Berto, that's beyond ridiculous.

 

It wasn't targeted at anyone in particular.

 

Theyd have to add lomachenko vs walters as co feature

 

If the undercard is STACKED then I would consider it...

 

I will, if this happens.