Criticizing Jones' resume

Calzaghe's resume is better than Jones'.

And Calzaghe didn't have to rely on PEDs to win.

 

No, it's not

 

No, I've just put it out there.

I said they were conflicting accounts, and that was a rumour.

I haven't said that it was factual.

 

Quite possibly the funniest thing I've ever read on here.

atsch

 

Why would you do that unless you are trying to slander him?

You said it was a report, not a rumor

 

I'm not trying to slander anyone.

I said there were conflicting accounts of why the fight wasn't made.


At some point last year, I went online and I found the following information:

Murad said he no showed at the press conference.

There was speculation that he may have been out of shape, and that he'd been drinking.

Kerry Davis stating that he and HBO tried to make the fight on numerous occasions.

Reports from Roch's camp, stating that he was fit and healthy, and ready to fight.

Reports stating that Telesco was a late replacement.

Documents detailing the start of his court case against the WBC, in Jan 2000.


Which is why I've said, both on this thread, and on one in the classic, that it was a strange case, due to the conflicting accounts.

 

You will have to excuse my cronological error. But it really doesnt change anything. Look at DM's next 4 fights after Hill. Are those better fighters than Jones was fighting? But lets get back to the Guthrie issue. DM had 90 days to fight him after Hill and chose to duck him and be stripped again. For that matter why did he never fight Nunn or Johnson? Fact is if you look into this a little deeper you can see just how biased and unfair youre being with Jones just to let DM skate on his almost parralel career.

 

You posted that there were reports of Roch being out of shape and drinking heavily. There were no reports of any such thing. You were posting slander as if it was a actual fact.

Murad was talking ****. Who has ever heard of a fight being cancelled because a fighter did not turn up to a press conference.
And when he was ordered to make the fight again he then came out with another set of excuses

There was no speculation.

The WBC was happy with Rochigianni's lawyers explanation which is why they ordered team Jones to make the fight again.

Kery Davis was lying.

Roch could not get a fight which is why he was forced to take the WBC to court in order to force them to enforce their own rules.
The rules of the wbc state clearly that the wbc champion has to give the interim champion a title shot at the first available opportunity. Its the reson why the wbc was on Jones case to make the fight

Roch even took out another court case against Murad Muhammad and that was when the fight finally got signed.

Do you think Roch was spending all of that time and money with legal battles while turning down fights?

And look what happened. At the first excuse Jones killed the fight.

Which he was. He did not want to break his camp for a press conference.

Pretty much irrelevant

Which is when he took the wbc to court after they stupidly sided with Jones and then dropped him from their rankings

Its obvious what the truth is . The fact that Rochigianni would go on to win his court case should really tell you all that you need to know.

 

Or you can post on the bogus hidden agenda "lets laugh at Roy Jones Career thread" After that you can post on the devout nuthugging Joe slappy Calzaghe greatest mw ever thread.

Its politics baby boxing style dig up a few turds and turn a guys career into a mountain of shizit. Just so you can point the finger at the bad guy.

Total bullshizit and quit brushing with ****flavored crest. :bbb:bbb:bbb

 

Another little fact, the WBA just threw their belt into the Jones tarver fight mix, very unusual at that tiem when the guys were fighting for the wbc..

has any other boxer been handed belts like Jones in the past ?

 

Zod,

You're looking for an argument, and I'm not going to give you one.

I've never purposely slandered anyone, which I've clarified.

I said that after doing a bit of digging last year, I found conflicting reports.

I listed everything that I found, and I left it open to interpretation.

Now all of a sudden Kerry Davis was lying? Yet he wasn't on other links that you've previously posted? You're happy to post up links where HBO slated Roy, but then when the VP of HBO says they tried to make a fight, he was lying?

I don't care that Roy never fought Roch. He fought better fighters and took on bigger challenges.

I don't think that it's a glaring omission from his resume.

What if he had've fought and beaten him?

Would any of the jokers on here have given him credit?

They'd have just dismissed the win, and then accused him of ducking someone else instead.

 

Jones and Joe are nothing alike and in terms as to who they fought Jones didn't pad his record to protect his 0 like Joe did .


By the way why was this moved ?

 

Joe Louis fought almost once a month for 13 months, many against top 10 fighters when there was only ONE belt. But DM couldnt do it against a "nobody" as you put it. Lmao!!