*7 defenses I wonder if Floyd's steadfast refusal over the last SIX YEARS to face his #1 contender has anything to do with the lack of credit he gets? Or maybe it's the fact that none of his seven defenses have been against a top 5 welterweight? Nope. It's probably because he's black. Speaking of top-50 ATG lists that you don't even have, guess it's time to take Langford, Robinson, Armstrong, Charles, Louis, and Ali out of my top 10.
Oh look, Duran displaying boxing skills that you didn't even notice because you DKSAB: [yt]x6Xj1N7OxEc[/yt]
Please do...and while you're at it, feel free to take moore, tyson, hagler and the rest of the black community out of your posts. how about you just don't watch any fights with black fighters and don't even comment on a thread about a black fighter? that would be wonderful :good
You know who's prone to inappropriate laughter at things that aren't very funny.......................the mentally challenged.
Can we just please end these stupid threads and not reply anymore? The guy that started it is clearly a loser. The idea of a load of people of on the internet 'laughing' at a professional athlete is too re****ed to give serious consideration to, so lets all just just mark off 'cereal monotony' as one of lifes inadequates. Pathetic.
I simply don't think people like you know how stupid you are when you say things like that. Go and suggest to Leonard,Hagler,Palomino,Benitez,Buchanan and any of his opponents that Duran couldn't cut it at elite level and you would be laughed out of the room. atsch
this :deal if you read what these morons and duran dik riders on here are saying, their reasoning is so contradictory and screwed up, it's like they're not even listening to themselves or like they gave up on tryna make sense...they just wanna stick their fingers in their ear and yell "duran is the greatest and floyd is schit and if you don't agree, fk you, you a troll and should be banned" it's like people with some kind of psychological condition that leads to mass denial...like the german people during hitler's time....they even make sh8t up to prove a point and come to ridiculous conclusions there's absolutely no basis basis for. here's a sample: - fierce denial that in montreal srl fought flat-footed and elected to slug it out with duran, thereby fighting at 50% of his ability...and even so, he STILL arguably beat duran. - at the same time insisting that not only did duran MAKE srl fight flat footed and trade punches with him but that duran miraculously transformed into a skilled boxer during the course of the fight and managed to give leonard a boxing lesson. - insisting that duran was not in shape for the rematch, as if that's srl's problem...and besides it's a lie. duran was just a scumbag who quit rather tha lose. - claiming duran is the greatest lw champ of all time, even though the first time duran faced a solid guy at lw, he got dropped and outclassed. - claiming duran to be a great fighter, even though duran LOST TO EVERY TOP FIGHTER HE FACED. - trying to validate duran by claiming that ken buchanan and dejesus were great fighters when they were not even close. - getting all rayciss and butt-hurt and schit and even begging the mods to ban posters when faced with the incontrovertible truth about duran. as if putting people on ignore and throwing around rayciss comments is soothe their hurt feelins...then again, maybe they a buncha childen.
only responding in case any new fans read this and don't realise it's just trolling - how is the younger, bigger, stronger fighter, with an aggressive style, engaging with the smaller, slower, 10 year lw, in the same style he fought all his previous fights, not fighting his own fight? - unskilled? footage, plus every fighter who fought him says you are wrong. - duran wasn't in shape for the rematch, eleta took the money and ran. Duran should have got in shape but the fight should never have been taken by his side. - then he beat him twice.(and no, de jesus wasn't the first decent lw he faced at all, the third or fourth at least) - ernesto marcel - they were very good indeed. - what?
- do you guys have any idea you sound everytime you call a different opinion "Trolling"? as if nobody could actually have a different view from you... no, they just couldn't be serious...:rofl - how was srl bigger and stronger? are you saying duran was still a featherweight and that srl was still a jww? - it's why he lost to every top fighter he faced? - bs...duran was in the best shape of his career...he wasn't that stupid. and even if he wasn't that was no reason to quit. a fighter is supposed to fight...not quit when the going gets rough. - my point is, if he's the best lw of all time, what's he doing getting dropped and humiliated by a guy like dejesus....dejesus was no great shakes....and dejesus was a drug addict all his career...duran struggled with dejesus because a sober dejesus was just as good as duran was and probably better. - ernesto marcel? dude y'all really s****ing the bottom of the barrel now to validate durans mediocre oppostion - they were good...nobody is saying duran wasn't good. he had to be good to be lw champ and beat other champs. - stick around here a little.