Cruiserweight and Heavyweight thread.

You are beyond reasoning with. Just ignore what's said and repeat your argument in a full circle.

There are different ways of developing fighters sure... Long road or the short road - different curves for when they are tested. But Wilders first couple of years are atrocious any way you spin it. As for Lomachenko... The loss had as much to do with the incredibly poor reffing of Lawrence Cole as well as Salidos fouling than anything else.

Wilders improved in the gym for sure.. I'll give him that. Developed a decent jab, good at maintaining distance(at times) still extremely clumsy, mechanically and defensively flawed at times as well. None of that is relevant though, his improvements as fighter make his dodging of elite competition even more pathetic - wouldn't you agree?

You can't handle any criticism of Wilder as a fighter or how he's handled his career . It's just all irrational hate in your mind. Which is why you're dredging up irrelevant 4 year old quotes because you don't have any ground to stand in a debate regarding the pathetic route he's taken as a champion, or his likely future plans. 2+ years and 5 defenses in.... Not a single top 10 opponent, hell even considering any of them top 15 is a stretch.

 

Haha! Duck Wilder???? You are a jester,arent you.You overprotected hype job is a reigning world champ whose best scalp is........................Stiverne.Pathetic! Nobody ducks Wilder,mate!
It is your boy who ducks whoever poses a threat to him.
Parker? Wilder should take a page out of a book,so to speak.Compare Wilder's first 20 fights with Parker's ones.
Pah! A difference like day and night!

 

Agreed except I think Ortiz probably will knock him out.