David Diaz barely and i mean barely got by a shot Chavez. See this is why....

I didn't like that Mayweather pick Marquez i bashed Mayweather for that. But like it or not but Mayweather vs Marquez even though was called a mismatch did 1 million ppv buys. The Last time Pacquiao fought a mismatch that was on hbo ppv it did 250k lol.

 

I don't think it was a robbery. I have it 115-113 for Spinks. But if you want to called that a close decision a robbery then i can easily say that Pacquiao got a gift decision win over Marquez since mostly everyone that isn't a biased Pacquiao fans thought Marquez won the fight.

 

True! Chavez isn't what he was but he's still solid. Katsidis KOing Chavez was expected. Katsidis almost beat Casa...even though that Casa was a shell of his former self as well. still a good win for Diaz.

 

Could you possibly see a way how anyone can score that fight for Phillips?

By judging from your scorecard you were obviously reaching for him in that fight and gave him every close round.

 

History will NOT remember Pac as a cherry picker, that is safe to say. So who cares what a couple of sore idiots say.

 

I'm not the only one that score it 115-113 for Spinks. Alot of other people got the same score as i did. I like that you ignored when i say that mostly everyone that isn't a biased Pacquiao thought Marquez won the rematch but i guess thats not a robbery right?

 

You avoided my question.

And those handful who scored it 115-113 for SPinks were haters, due to his non entertaining style.

 

Obviously you do....And when the water settles, your God Pac will be ranked lower than DLH, that I can assure you of.

I don't even rank DLH in the top 40.

 

My God? I couldn't care less where Pac is ranked. I like watching his fights. :good. Oh and stop mentioning DLH like I hate the guy. Did you assume I was Filipino and hate him cause he's Mexican-American. :rofl

You are so sore. :rofl

When I said "who cares" it just means a couple of butthurt scrubs like you will not affect his ranking, WHATEVER that ranking is.

 

Very true. No fighter can fight ATGs or P4P bests every fight, its taxing as well as hard to negotiate. But seriously, why throw that Mayweather stuff in, because he's getting just as much hate for the same thing. He picked the P4P #2 fighter, beat him easily, and gets shot down for it. After he beats Mosley they'll say he beat an old man, and shouldve faced him early (when he was "ducking" him). When he beats Pacquiao they'll say he beat another little guy. When he beats Cotto they'll say he's ducking Paul Williams. When he beats Paul Williams they'll say he's cherry picking because he didn't call Roberto Duran out of retirement.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Theres no doubt Marquez fought the better competition at lightweight. Pac chose an easier opponent in Diaz than Marquez did with Casa and
Diaz.

 

man...this thread is a ****in waste of time...

 

I thought Diaz beat Chavez clearly, and giving the one draw to Jesus was a stretch.

That said, yes, Pac did make sure he picked on the weakest top lightweight. So? Every fighter cherrypicks from time to time. Look a Floyd.

Pacquiao followed it up by getting in with Oscar De La Hoya and boxing brilliantly again, and a very tough Ricky Hatton who was the best in his division.

 

Hindsight being 20/20...pac would have smashed Casamayor and Baby Bull Diaz. It was already a weak division by the time Pac arrived. No money fights there..