he shouldnt have been in the ring with Haye. congrats to the excuse maker for giving gray headed ruiz loss #9 :rofl
i'm now convinced you're a teenager. some of the stuff you post is pure childish and small minded. ruiz was a worthy challenge... he lost by a MD in the first valuev fight, lost by split in the chagaev fight, and lost a real close one in the second valuev fight. this showed that he was still competing on a high level. none of them stopped ruiz, but haye did. it was a good solid win, and a good fight to watch. ruiz didn't bring his usual huggy bear tactics and actually came to have a clean fight. don't see what the problem is? so stop being such a child. grow up.
Then Vitali shouldn't have called him out and said he can knock him out after the Wlad fight, when he can neither knock him out or beat him. It's because they could not take it if :bowdown Haye :bowdown beats either bro and they know he is the one who is capable of doing so
and im convinced you are a moron. ruiz hadnt beaten a top 10 opponent since Golota in 2004. Ruiz had 3 ****ing wins in 5 years vs 25-18-1 Otis Tisdale :rofl 38-8-3 McCline (coming off 2 losses) :-( 19-10-1 Adnan Serdin :happy to say this was anything but a joke is TYPICAL for Haye fanboys. Your theory that ruiz was losing close fights so thats ok and worthy. a 38 year old gray headed old far that has lost 3 of his last 6 is totally a **** opponent even for that paper belt haye had. now go learn something about the sport fan boy