Dawson proves hes a nancy boy coward runner

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Anglosaxon, Dec 18, 2008.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    [YT]p43zwTX3nbk[/YT]

    check out the video. Calzaghe claims that a fight with Dawson doesn't mean anything in terms of legacy, that he hasn't proven himself and has done nothing. The implication is clear, he's not interested in fighting Dawson.
     
  2. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    It has nothing to do with vacating belts. If he doesn't take the rematch, then Tarver could sue him for his purse from the first fight.
     
  3. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    "Vacating the belts" does not get you out of a rematch clause.

    Only a completely idiotic noob would not know that. :patsch
     
  4. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    Dawson, Pavlik, Lacy, all the same all Ameribums.
     
  5. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    Didn't Klit's say Haye had to work his way up the ladder, how he was only 220lbs, how he'd have to get in a long line... Boxers say things, and then its up to the challengers to tempt them, and change their mind, you could tell Joe changed his mind about Pavlik, had Pavlik beaten Hopkins, I'm sure Joe would have had that fight arranged already. Dawsons either useless at self promotion, or he is running scared.
     
  6. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    no pavlik and dawson are a notch above lacy
     
  7. SHOWSHOOTER

    SHOWSHOOTER Active Member Full Member

    789
    0
    Oct 13, 2008
    dawson v tarver - what a ****in joke

    theres no wonder american boxing stinks of ****.
     
  8. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    8,521
    139
    Jul 21, 2008
    As I said, im sure he'd step aside for a pay off, wouldnt be the first fighter to do this, but why was ''Bad Chad'' sounding off about Calzaghe after Jones? 5 weeks later he makes this? LOSER.
     
  9. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Neither Woods, Tarver nor Oscar had been getting sparked years ago so that they had to drop their level of competition to non top 10 ranked opposition just so they could continue their careers.
     
  10. billyk

    billyk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,494
    1
    Oct 19, 2008
    I pretty much agree with him. In terms of reaching the pinnacle of the sport, for sporting reasons, I think Joe done that when he fought Kessler and has been in something approaching semi-retirement ever since. He's only been fighting the big names of his own generation, who he probably wanted to fight for years.
    Dawson, imo is the next generation. History won't judge either Joe or Chad harshly if they don't fight.
     
  11. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Yet again: rematch clause ****nuts.
     
  12. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Agreed.
     
  13. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    very true that doesn't stop them being past it still though does it.
     
  14. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    That is exactly what we're dealing with here. I'm glad we are all on the same page gents.
     
  15. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    It stops them from being proven as shot to **** before they were beaten in their most recent fights.