Dawson vs Pascal - Now for Ring Belt

The P4P ranking arn't the ten best current fighters, whereas the individual weight divisions are supposed to be....

Like I say, I'm giving you the reason, not defending it....;O)

 

So what is it?

Have The Ring ever actually defined it? What basis does Caballero get in on?

 

Like the Tories are going to sit back an let you rip off the film industry.:good

IMHO whoever gets in is going to try and tighten things up with regards downloading, we can only hope that D/Ling old fights falls under the radar.

 

I'll oppose the Tories if and when they make a stand.
Currently it's Labour who are being knobs. with some Tory support.

Having said that I hate Labour too. I vote whoever champions my interests.

Bottom line is this - none of them give a **** about you, you're better off spoiling your ballot paper.

 

This IS still a boxing board isn't it?

Lets keep the politics in The Lounge, eh? It'll be long and tedious month in here otherwise....

;O)

 

I'd guess each contributer has his own preferences??

 

That would my guess too. Which is why you end up with what they have rather than anything that can be legitimately called a P4P top ten.

 

Not to give away my political leaning's, but this man gets my vote.

This content is protected

 

I like Dawson, but he strangely seems to take time off from fights (and I don't feel it intentional).

He is fast, but needs to be in the right position to be fast - if you know what I mean.

Think Dawson will beat Pascal, but get the feeling that Chad, right now, is possibly moving from the underrated, into the overrated arena.

 

Still, it's a good fight, no doubt and a live one... it can only be welcomed - more of it I say!

 

Maybe a letter/ Email to The Ring might shed some light?

 

What?!

 

A tad naive?

 

Indeed.

 

Be sad to see you go :hi: