easy fight for witter IMO to good for d hop to fast bit of a **** fight imo but its to make witter look good stateside
Aaaah, but like you said earlier, "everyone else's opinion doesn't mean ****. Only the 3 judges opinion's matter. Deal with it." :deal
Hah!! Its true. I think that in this fight we'll see Witter playing his effective counterpunch game on a less than slick D-hop landing some big bangers wearing down the American. Then as hands drop and D-hops mouth falls agape, look to Witter to close the show by putting his own pressure on, IMO anyways...
I've never seen Hopkins fight, what's he like? Seen that he's tall, long reach. If he fights at range then it'll be boring, because Witter won't press the fight and they'll spend 12 rounds pawing at each others gloves.
BigReg, your nuthugging of a bum like Demetrius Hopkins is beyond absurd. I KNOW you didn't watch the fight with Forbes, because any ****** who watched that fight knows it was a paid-off robbery. I welcome you to go to google and find ANY fight recap from any boxing website, and then come back here and admit to all of us all how much of a ****in ****** you are. Matter of fact.. here I'll do it for ya.. Click here for proof that BigReg doesnt watch fights, just reads results off of BoxRec :deal Pay particular attention to the middle of the article when they talk about how the judges for this fight were forced on Steve Forbes' camp.. Demetrius Hopkins is a ****in bum. I'm getting sick of Golden Boy. First Hopkins/Forbes, then Santa Cruz/Casamayor.. and of course the purchasing of The Ring.. **** Golden Boy and their bull****. They're a huge black eye for the sport of boxing.
Nice fight but if a have to pick a winner based on what I've see I'll go with Witter, D-hop didn't impressed me that much on the Forbes bout. D-hop has a good reach that he will need to use to keep away Witter, but Witter is fast and more experienced, he knows how to get inside (he did it to Vivian Harris, whom I believe is taller than Witter)
My friend, you are too stupid for words. Please find one post in this thread where I said that I thought Hopkins beat Forbes. In fact, I focused all of my attention on the judges. Anyone with half a brain could see that I based my whole argument of Hopkin's winning that fight on the basis that only the 3 judges' opinions mattered. The ******ed kid that pushes the carts at my local ACME has enough sense to figure out that I purposely avoided giving my opinion on the fight in order support the argument that Hopkins won that fight despite the fact that seemingly everyone but those 3 judges saw a victory for Forbes.