Did Calzaghe lose a step since Kessler?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ChrisPontius, Apr 30, 2008.


  1. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I think it has much to do with the standard of opponent.

    Also, Hopkins can make anyone look slow and ponderous!
     
  2. Boro chris

    Boro chris Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,275
    21
    Mar 14, 2005
    If your a big Joe fan and biassed then Joe has clearly lost a step or two since Kessler. Or since Byron Mitchell if you like. That was the shade of Calzaghe against Hopkins.

    If your a little bit like this ****ing windowlicker I've just quoted then you alow your bias against a particular fighter become glaringly obvious and so everyone knows your opinion is worth **** all on this particular subject.
    3 years time it will be a different fighter, same tired, bs argument.
     
  3. G_RapPBF

    G_RapPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,985
    0
    Nov 22, 2007
    He's been fighting C level competition for years. He steps in against Hopkins and its obvious what would have happened had he been fighitng in America 10 years ago.
     
  4. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    13
    Sep 21, 2006
    Calzaghe was pretty gone vs Lacy even, that wasn't Calzaghe at his fastest. Nothing like it.
     
  5. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  6. Stickandmove

    Stickandmove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,710
    2
    Mar 13, 2006
    I thought that Joe looked like a 'shot' fighter against Bika. 'Shot' turned out to be an exaggeration but Calzaghe has declined markedly since his peak years ('97 - 2003).
     
  7. Stickandmove

    Stickandmove Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,710
    2
    Mar 13, 2006
    I agree. Joe was already past his physical prime when he fought Lacy. He'd lost some speed by then already.
     
  8. ghostlybadge

    ghostlybadge Punch Drunk Full Member

    2,003
    109
    Dec 9, 2007
    his last 4 fights you can see the speed going from him. against kessler he was fighting to prove he was the best now he is fighting for money so i do not think you will see Joe as he used to be and that is a shame
     
  9. headhunter

    headhunter Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,592
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    You mean in the same way as Hatton was outclassing Mayweather before Mayweather knock him out.:rofl
     
  10. Faetter_BR

    Faetter_BR Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,778
    0
    Aug 4, 2004
    I don't think he has faded - but he has stepped up his opponents - which of course makes him look worse - it's so much easier to look good versus Ashira & Manfredo then it is versus Kessler - and well against Hopkins you just can't look good - come to think of it - a fight with Hopkins in corner can never look good...
     
  11. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Joe has a couple left in him, he isnt in his prime, he cant be after so many years fighting but he is still the best out there.

    Hopkins is the one that ruined the fight, its his tactics that made Joe looked bad, if he hugged less, joe would have got off with more punches simple as that.

    Put someone in front of joe who actually wants to fight and you will see another master class.
     
  12. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Even young Roy jones didnt look like the superman he was when he fought Hopkins...
     
  13. sjc

    sjc Active Member Full Member

    1,235
    1
    Jun 18, 2006
    Joe walked through Bernards shots all night, what you smokin' Junior?
     
  14. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    10
    Aug 7, 2004
    No he just fought a better fighter. A fighter who makes EVERYONE look slow, old, etc.
     
  15. sjc

    sjc Active Member Full Member

    1,235
    1
    Jun 18, 2006
    A better DEFENSIVE fighter I think you may have meant. :good