Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

I’ve called BJS out for all sorts of stuff, think he’s a scumbag personally but what he got busted for is legal under most drug testing regimes except in fight night...not saying that’s right...his team obviously didn’t realise Vada have different rules...

It’s nowhere near as bad as Dianobol and he was punished more severely...Whyte was allowed to fight...

 

Whyte doesn’t deserve the right to call himself a professional boxer ever again.

Two-time cheats shouldn’t be rewarded with title shots and the purses that go with them.

Ban him for life.

If he wants to box, let him box groceries.

 

I'm inclined to think Whyte is not on the juice. My evidence is of course circumstantial. Firstly, UKAD let him box. Secondly, he paid for VADA and passed every VADA test. Thirdly, he doesn't box like someone who is on the juice. He gasses mid to late rounds without fail.
I'm guessing there's a piece of the puzzle we're missing that will exonerate Dillian in the coming weeks.

 

TONY HAYERS WHERE ARE YOU

 

It was on the banned list. It was just classed as “out of competition” because it weren’t fight night. Which is absolutely ludicrous.

 

If it was all innocent and ok then it would have been over with straight away. He has clearly failed a test with UKAD. Also he is a WBC ranked fighter so he has to sign up to VADA I believe.

 

He got knocked down in the 9th, recovered and controlled the rest of the fight (against Rivas) despite being significantly heavier than he was against Chisora.

He did not gas against Chisora and carried power into that 11th round.

So what if he passed all 6 VADA tests in them 84 days, he FAILED a UKAD test. Stop defending this drug cheat.

 

I do not condone any fails. However I do think there are different levels. I cannot stand BJS but (whether the rules are correct) he was clearly playing by UKAD rules. Which is his fault for not bothering to check thoroughly the VADA rules. No excuse what so ever, but slightly different to BBM going full Lance Armstrong and hooking himself up to every piece of gear he could get his hands on.

 

Dom ingle has been around the game long enough to know which list to check for which fights. He has trained multiple world champions ffs. They were cutting weight illegally and got caught. Simple as that.

 

If he failed and there were no explainable circumstances, why did UKAD let him fight? We don't know all of the facts.

 

There’s 112 pages of discussion regarding this. Read some of it, mate. Money talks. UKAD don’t have the financial clout to back up their own science to deal with the top end athletes of this sport.

 

Most likely situation IMO is that they offered passed VADA tests as evidence he was clean (despite the contrary UKAD failure) and this was accepted. You have to remember, if no one leaked this to Hauser then literally none of this would be public knowledge, so they acted on the assumption that this wouldn't be getting out. The Fury case could have bankrupt UKAD, so I suspect they would look for any reason possible to exonerate another high profile fighter in Whyte.

He's a cheat, so is Saunders and so is Fury.

 

There is a legal process to follow here. The bottom line is they can't stop him from boxing until they charge him with an offence. Dillian Whyte presented evidence the day before the fight, that evidence has to be considered before they decide exactly what charges to bring. That is not something that is done on the day, i.e. you show your evidence and they give you a thumbs up or down it has to be evaluated, considered and discussed which is a process that could take weeks, months or even years (Fury and Molina). Hearn and Whyte saying nothing publicly is simply them buying time in the hope they can somehow wriggle out of it. They are both up **** creek and they know it.

 

silence is an admission of guilt

 

From what i can gather of this whole **** stain is basical this.

The only reason why the fight was allowed to continue is because of some procedural bull****. Whyte had a hearing, gave some excuse "but mate me VADA was clear" which UKAD took as an acceptable excuse and now have to follow their procedure in forming a conviction should they find some extra cash down the back of the sofa.

Rather than halting the event and gathering more evidence ie testing the B sample.