Dirrell in for a rude awakening!!!!

When this fight is over we will hear "and the new"

 

Thanks man. I was just venting. This place has that effect on me. :good

 

FFFFFRRRRRRROOOOOOCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


.......................KO's Dirrell. :deal

 

Hey Socrates. I'm alright.

How are you?

Good work on the ''47-0'' thread.

Hey, what's the name of that fighter you had in your avatar prior to your current one (right mean looking *******)?

Can you recommend some of his fights for me to check out? :good

 

Froch, middle doors,possibily early doors

 

tired:!::-blood:huh:|:barf:roll::hi::dead:fire:deal

 

When the cobra connects, it's lights out for Dirrell.

It's one thing looking good against extremely mediocre opposition, but fighting a throwback like Froch is nightmare.

Dirrell will look stellar for 4 rounds... but when it's round 9,10,11 and Froch is getting faster and throwing harder shots.. and Dirrell's legs are dog tired due to his style, then it's going to be a world of pain for Andre.

Ref stop fight round 11.

Dirrell will go out on his shield and will gain a lot of respect.

But he will NOT win this one.

Froch will be looking to make a massive statement after the Taylor fight.

 

Not a bad point. We shall see.

 

Im picking Dirrell to beat up Froch and to knock him out

 

It's such an interesting tournament, you can really make a case that ANYONE is the "sleeper" in it, outside of Kessler.

 

All you did is polarize everything I said into meaning the extreme opposite.

1. Saying froch isn't a good boxer doesn't mean I hate all foreign fighters. That's how lower level people think and PROBABLY how the poeple who thought your reply was good think. You didn't really say anything and you cut my words up to take em out of context and threw out some generaliztions.
2. Saying someone isn't good at something doesn't mean you are a hater. If it's true it's true. Froch is not a good fighter. He has nothing but journeymen potential like I said. Somehow you took that and got me calling him a journeyman out of it. I said he only has that potential. He's not a journeyman yet but he will be soon. Like right after this tourney.

It all comes down to froch not being good. Not any other generalization you wanna make up after that. It's an opinion which I explain why he isn't that good. You can't come up with any way to explain anything you said PROBABLY about and all sorts of low level stuff you was coming with. You obviously thinks he's good and I got no problem with that. Just don't take my opinion and polarize it to mean more than it does. We were talkin about the fighters individually and nobody else. Froch is a slow guy who is just big and strong for his weight with a supposedly granite chin.

I judge a fighter by what he does and how he fights, Not where he's from. That's what lower level people do. Same with race or any devider for that matter. You cant prove I'm biased for american fighters but you say it and people believe it like idiots. You can prove yourself wrong by reading my post though. You can see that I call em like I see em becuase there are sorry, average, good, and great fighters from everywhere. Simple common sense so don't come at me like i'm on your polarized black and white thinkin wavelenth. I really shouldn't have waisted my time but your sh1t is so ignorant I just couldn't help myself. Read my other post before you say some stupid **** implying that I'm biased because I stated and explained an opinion on a pretty average fighter.

Pascal moved up because there was a paperchamp there and he couldn't beat any of the top guys at 168. It's that simple and nothing more. 168 is deep and 175 only has Hopkins, Dawson and Johnson. That paper champ he beat was just that and yes I think dirrel would have beat that paper champ too as would everyone in the super six plus Bute, Green and bika.

 

Good post, I agree with the ending there. Dirrell is a bit of a runner but seems to be trying to turn over a new leaf. We will soon see how the kid responds to a hostile overseas crowd.

 

Froch has experience and the home crowd on his side. But as far as skills go, Dirrell is the better boxer. I am looking for the kid to make a statement as he TKO's Froch in front of his fans.

 

Dirrell is quick enough and skilled enough to outbox Froch for long periods as Froch is not that fast and has a porous defence. But Dirrell does sometimes stand and trade for too long which would be a mistake against Froch. I have no doubt froch will land and take Dirrell where he has never been before, it will all come down to how Dirrell reponds and wether he is durable enough and can ride out those tough times to take it to the score cards.

I am slightly favouring Dirrell but we will find out as soon as Froch lands hard, what happens from then on will decide the outcome.

 

I love some of these predictions,they are like weather forecasts.."tomorrow it may rain,but it may also be dry and sunny"