Do you think a title belt should be at stake for the PAC-Cotto fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buxzer, Jul 26, 2009.

  1. RomperStomper

    RomperStomper Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    891
    Likes Received:
    0
    As a bargaining chip I guess it still means something as far as me actually caring about it being yet another supposed world championship fight - zilch. ...I only care if good fighters are matched against eachother I like watching good fights and could care less about the more political side of boxing.
     
  2. RomperStomper

    RomperStomper Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    891
    Likes Received:
    0
    To add to that good fighters have been matched against eachother and im excited to watch.
     
  3. Jude

    Jude Just Journeying Man Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,394
    Likes Received:
    2
    Its at welterweight, they have agreed 145 between them, that's their business, but its at welterweight so cottos belt should at stake. If Pacquaio wins then he will have defend his title at 147, unless his opponent agrees to a catchweight between 140 and 147. I fink.
     
  4. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    79,438
    Likes Received:
    2,647
    I think yes solely based on the fact that I find it unfair to Pacquiao that other fighters have fought for titles at catchweights and noone complained, but people get pissed off when Pac does it

    Why is Pacquiao subjected to these double-standards?
     
  5. RomperStomper

    RomperStomper Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    891
    Likes Received:
    0
    To address the double-standard issue they were pretty much created by haters to hate they prefer someone else to there said guy for example Mosley and Margarito why does Mosley get so much less hate than Margarito for cheating because on average people prefer him. In Pacquaio's case people always love to hate on the top dog It's always been that way everyone's talking about the one fighter and ignoring the others ..getting a huge fan base thats often stupid and over hyping the hell of him gets much hate. In my book though Pac beats Cotto and then Mayweather I might have to declare him a living god.
     
  6. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    31,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    You *******s are about to brag that Pac won titles in 7 divisions if Pac wins, yet Pac/Roach asked a man to come in at 143, and he agrees to come in at 145...for the money. Why should the title be on the line at a catch weight when the champ can't weigh in at the weight he wants? People think Roach is trying to weaken Cotto. Nobody thought that Pav, Hop, and Chavez and others would be weakened making weight. We do know that the last major case of weight weakening at a catch weight came when Leonard beat Lalonde, and Lalonde ran out of energy before being brutally ko'd by Leonard. People know how Cotto struggled to make weight at 140, and fans are wondering why Pac is making a big difference over two pounds, and Pac's fans saying two pounds is nothing. Then why ask Cotto to lose those two pounds???
     
  7. Dynasty091

    Dynasty091 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    0
    Meh this should be a good fight regardless if there is a belt at stake or not.
     
  8. scilent assasin

    scilent assasin p4p Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,016
    Likes Received:
    2
    itll make history if it is on the line and he wins so yes it does matter
     
  9. kpete14

    kpete14 Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why would it be for a belt, and it is not being fought at 147? This is for pound for pound status, no belt is needed. It shouldn't even be called a Welterweight fight!! All of these catch weights are getting out of hand any way. If you are the p4p champ, you should fight at any weight in your range. He fought Oscar at 147, why not Cotto...
     
  10. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    14,678
    Likes Received:
    186
    they are both going to weigh within the welter limit so yes
     
  11. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    6,107
    Likes Received:
    0
    So far the YES votes leading this poll... But I think each poll options has it's own valid points...

    Be it a title fight, a non-title fight, I don't care anymore...:D

    I voted YES just for the appeal of a title fight but it doesn't really matters...:lol:
    .
     
  12. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    20,449
    Likes Received:
    55
    Dose not matter to me. Should be a good fight while it lasts either way.
     
  13. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    32,102
    Likes Received:
    22,123
    Why should any boxer have to pay some crazzy outrages price for one of those belt? If you win it you have to give a percent of your purse to own it. The hell with the belts.
     
  14. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    28,518
    Likes Received:
    86
    I voted `I dont care` but Id have prefered the option `it should be up to cotto`

    He is the one that has to cut weight (not a lot, I know) so it should be his choice... if he didnt put the belt on the line tho, it would reek of lack of confidence.
     
  15. buxzer

    buxzer Eastern Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    6,107
    Likes Received:
    0

    Good point... I haven't thought of that...
    .