Really? So you are admitting that you have scored for legitimate decision in PAC favor .... how then you are saying that people ho (USUALLY) scores the same in PAC's favor know nothing about boxing?
atsch I'm saying that in the 4th meeting, which only made it to the halfway point, it looked like Pacquiao would've been on his way to a legitimate decision. We don't know because it didn't get to play out that way due to him getting KTFO. Had he taken a majority share of the 7th-12th, it would have been the first time in the series that he deserved the nod IMO.
I understood what you been saying, I just refer to one of your previous post when you have bashed out people who give props to PAC's offensive and attractive style so they know nothing about boxing. For me the previous fights were more or less a draw (no clear winner) so scoring rounds in one or other direction was more or less based on the private preference or taste. It is obvious PAC's style gave him better results because he was initialing the action, he was the one who thrown first and he landed more punches. Marquez was the one who capitalized from PAC's forward in style countering him and catching him out of balance ... not mention that all the beauty of Marquez punches in the third fight was perfectly enlighten by PAC insane long haircut bouncing impressively from left to right after each punch being landed So bottom line its a personal taste ... not the real knowledge of boxing which leads one to score in this or that favor.
Bring on Marquez Vs. Bradley. (The fight that should have been.) ^Back when JMM was 135 & Brad ran 140lbs. Make it happen @147.
I much rather see, JMM try to take on Mayweather again, he already gave Manny the boxing lesson of his life in the 3rd rematch, then one up'd that by brutally ko'ing him