Even the guys who scored it for JMM have Pac winning rounds all over the place. I've seen on ESB guys who scored it for JMM give Pac rounds 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12. The only rounds I haven't seen people who score it for JMM give to Pac are rounds 4, 5, and 7
I don't know where people get the JMM didn't do **** in the later rounds from. I think from round 9if and on he was throwing some bice rights and combos. Easy victory and he was robbed. JMM the real champ. **** was a blow out.
Once again a close fight and hard to score. Jmm did land the cleaner punches but that is almost always the case when these two fight. The rounds that I thought Manny won he was the aggressor and landed more punches, most power shots. Manny does not throw enough body shots to keep his opponent off balance. Manny needs to go back to boxing 101. He doesn't move to his right like he should. I had it 115-113 Pac. JMM did most of his damage in the middle rounds and was hesitant in the latter rounds. Much respect to JMM for a great showing........he deserved the win for the warrior that he is but losing to Manny is not so bad.
Really? No ****. The judges had 12 rounds to score correctly and they never got the right decision. Who ****ing cares about your sprint bull**** comparison? Marquez won more rounds just for the fact that he landed more meaningful punches. Pacquiao just kept missing. If people expect you to dominate and you've done anything but dominate, you deserve to lose. **** you.
True it is. But I have asked some questions in this thread where guys just stop responding...It actually happens all the time.
yea **** those judges, its only their job and were hired for a reason, while u, who know's how to score fights, is sitting on eastside boxing telling other folks **** you, good job keyboard warrior fine u dont' want the judges, peep the stats, folks did use that excuse for **** drinker winning the 1st two fights correct? but now in this case with manny having the better numbers, "compubox don't know ****"