Eddie Chambers vs Tomasz Adamek

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Ripple633, Feb 7, 2010.


  1. tojikiston

    tojikiston Contender Full Member

    1,179
    1
    Aug 3, 2009
    If Estrada gave him the hardest fight of his career, Slow Eddie will slap him silly!!!
    He might even knock the **** out of him!!!
     
  2. lzolnier

    lzolnier Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,524
    34
    Jan 20, 2007

    This is proof positive that a) You haven't seen the fight and are likely relying on a handful of Haye huggers b) you haven't seen Adamek's other fights. Adamek won 7 to 8 rounds. It was a comfortable UD, without any Adamek fireworks people are accustomed to. Chambers, with his best wins over Peter and Dimintrenko hasn't proven much to suggest he's a better fighter than Adamek. Adamek's resume shits on Chambers' any day. If Adamek wins over Arreola, his HW resume will already surpass Chambers' accomplishments in this division, in only his 3rd HW fight. Think about that.
     
  3. tojikiston

    tojikiston Contender Full Member

    1,179
    1
    Aug 3, 2009
    Slow Eddie fought a better fighters, plus he's getting better every time!
    Adamek, thou he's far better then loud and obnoxious british hypejob, he's Not better then Eddie!!!
    And he will not beat the Fatso, no way!!!

    disclaimer: if he beats Arreola, then I'll say you are right, but it ain't happening!
    :-(
     
  4. freelaw

    freelaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,143
    916
    Nov 17, 2007
    Chambers made me almost :yikes vs Dimitrenko. He said that they come to Germany not to just win but to finish the guy. 'Yeah right' I thought and then he just owned the giant. No KO but still... It was a beautiful domination, scorecards were German. With that agrresiveness and pretty powerful shots added to the skills he had before he made me a fan. I also think that he can still develop.

    As for Adamek, sadly to say as I'm his native and like him a lot, I have the same feeling. But we'll see.

    Edit: As skeptical as I am about it, we have to see if Adamek can adjust to HW. I say that Chambers takes this as for now but not necesesarilly convincingly. Aside of Klitschos, I'm still not convinced that anyone can beat him conincingly if he focuses on defense. But some beat him anyway...
     
  5. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009

    You just try to find anyway to discredit Chambers. This isn't about resumes because both have good resumes, but to discredit Chambers saying he hasn't fought anybody when in fact he has fought 4 top 10 heavyweights (one of them was a loss) is stupid. I understand you are a fan of Adamek but please give credit where credit is due.

    Edit: Chambers has fought 4 top 10 heavyweights (beat 3) and Adamek has fought 0, so how would Adamek have a better resume then Chambers at heavyweight if he beats Arreola? Also I would compare Adamek's win against Estrada similar to Chambers win against Dominick Guinn. Actually Dominick Guinn is a better boxer then Estrada. And if Chambers beats Wladimir Klitschko, well your opinion would definitely change about Chambers.
     
  6. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Chambers by competetive but comfortable decision 96-93.
     
  7. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,276
    5,903
    Oct 5, 2009
    Chambers has one good performance. What if he fights Adamek like the Povetkin fight or the Peter fight where he is chunky and afraid to throw a punch. We have only seen a trim and aggressive Chambers once what if he cant get in that shape or mental frame again. We know Adamek can handle adversity.
     
  8. popejking

    popejking Adamek Full Member

    4,160
    1
    Mar 27, 2009
    I agree with your opinion with the exception that Guinn is better boxer than Estrada. Estrada is very underrated. I dont say he is top10, because he isnt and probably will never be, but he may cause problems to almost every top10 (not including Klitschkos).

    On the other hand I can see Adamek beating all the guys who Chambers beat. And I give Adamek a chance against Povetkin. If Adamek beats Arreola then I would say Adamek vs Povetkin is 50-50 to me
     
  9. SevenSamurai

    SevenSamurai 3 year ESB vet. Full Member

    1,735
    1
    Aug 18, 2005
    Lets not forget that Cunningham pretty much beat Adamek in rounds, he just couldn't keep himself off the damn canvas.
     
  10. Ashstrodamus

    Ashstrodamus Rodney Dangerfield of ESB Full Member

    368
    1
    Jul 30, 2005
    I said POSSIBLY you moron. I didn't say he would. I guarantee if Chambers hits Adamek with those same rights that he caught Povetkin with, Goral WILL go down.
     
  11. Ashstrodamus

    Ashstrodamus Rodney Dangerfield of ESB Full Member

    368
    1
    Jul 30, 2005
    And when has Chambers been down? Adamek doesn't need a cheerleader.
     
  12. platnumpapi

    platnumpapi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,212
    4
    Jun 10, 2005
    eddie chambers out classes him, adamek dont belong at hw.hes got decent speed and power and ok boxing skills.he will not beat the klitchko's, chambers, haye, arreola, toney
    and maybe few others.im sure he can beat has beens and never was at hw but none of the top 10 guys.

    he just not that good to being with and at hw, hes going to run into faster guys and stronger guys.estrada fight was hard for him, what do you think the rest willl be ? or you think he just had a bad night ?

    hate to be one that said i told you so but i told you so.
     
  13. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    I think Eddie beats him up and gets a UD to put it simply 116,112 type scorecards as long as the fight happens on nuetral ground
     
  14. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,600
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think we need to see where Estrada goes from here before claiming how big an accomplishment the Adamek victory was.
     
  15. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
    This would be a great matchup and a very entertaining scrap.

    I'd go out on a limb a bit and say I think Adamek is going to do very well at HW. He's got great speed and technique for a HW and has enough size and strength to succeed.

    Still I'd favour Chambers in this one. He does everything Adamek does a bit better and I think he's win this with a close decision.