I always see Eddie Hearn being compared to Frank and how Frank has guided fighters from start to finish but imo it's the same as comparing fighters from different era's or stages in their careers. Frank has done it but so has Barry Hearn in the past so why don't we debate which of the new breed of the family are better? Imo Eddie and Frank's sons Francis and George are at the same stage of their careers so i don't think we can really judge any of them until they have actually taken a fighter from scratch and proved they have done things correctly or done wrong by their fighters. Who will come out on top? Eddie Hearn or Francis and George ****** ? Who do think? I think this could be a good battle over the next few years, imo Eddie is a little bit in front because of the Groves vs Froch fights but if Francis and George can learn certain things from old Frank but maybe run their Promotional companies in a different way they might manage to compete with Eddie in the future.