Edwin Valero v Timothy Bradley@140 lbs

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by marcelo86, Feb 7, 2010.


  1. artofwar

    artofwar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    i got valero by ko. bradley wont be able to stop valeros attack.
     
  2. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    I don't know about stronger....maybe stronger but less powerful. But Tim is faster and a better technical fighter for sure.
     
  3. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Homie.....Ed was getting hit FAAAAAR to much by Demarco. He was eating Jabs and counter hooks all night. Had Demarco been faster or stronger Ed would have had some real problems that didnt' have to do with a "bow" to the forehead.
     
  4. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    I compared Shane's comp to Forrest's before they fought, and Shane's comp to Cotto's at the time he fought him. Real talk, what is your point lol...:huh:-:)lol:
     
  5. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Had DeMarco been bigger and stronger lol...!!!???:nut Ed was fighting a guy who was 5' 10 with a longer reach who was naturally bigger than him, and other than being hit with the elbow, and a tiny cut on eye lid, he was unmarked. You have no point, and what you're saying sounds more childish than stupid.
     
  6. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    different situations.

    plus bradley is the SBA.:deal
     
  7. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    That is exactly the way I see it. Valero does one thing punchers normally don't do and that is he rarely lets his opponent tie him up when he is attacking. People truly don't think Valero can't box, or that he is not fast himself. Comical...
     
  8. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Bradley doesn't pack Valero's punch, at least not P4P, but he's a more well rounded, well schooled fighter and definitely a more consistent body puncher. He'd win this.
     
  9. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    I could name 2000 sitchations like this, and you would still come up with the same infantile response:lol:.
     
  10. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    LOL....Yea....Demarco is soooooo BIG and STRONG nall.:lol: Nall.....you are a child....and given the fact that you ride the short bus, I'm guessing intelligence is lacking...Not that your boy who wears the helment and the dude that gets around in the wheel chair are ******ed or anything, but lets just say they aren't Albert Einstien.
     
  11. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    bradley is a slick mofo, valerho is robotic :deal
     
  12. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Yo J, Relentless wanted me to compare Valero's comp to Bradley's. Let me ask you something...who had more experience, Ward or Kessler when they fought, and who won...
     
  13. steele311

    steele311 Wanna Dance? Full Member

    2,248
    0
    Jan 29, 2009
    Going with Bradley on this one. He'll make mincemeat outta Valero!
     
  14. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,332
    634
    Jun 16, 2006
    Valero is a lightweight.
    Match him against the best lightweights.
    Lets see how he does here before you move him up.
     
  15. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    Charlie, you're what I call an "if" man. You are a, "If I had a bigger *****, my wife wouldn't have left me man"...ya pussheaded degenerate lol... You are still my man Chuck lol...