~ ESB's BIG FIGHT PICKS ~ Review panel for contested results - NOMINATE and VOTE! ~

Let's have two more...better to have 5 because if all 5 call it a robbery, it probably is!

 

And, naturally too, with a late edit as usual. :yep

 

Good post. I fully agree with that.

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

At the moment, we're going exclusively by official results. If a clear robbery occurs, by common consensus, a review panel made up of respected, objective top analysts will decide whether the result should be overruled for the purposes of our league.

Please nominate respected, objective, good analysts in this thread. I will put up the most popular names up for a vote and the top 3/5 names form the review panel.:good

Panelists need to be good enough analysts to know the score (the better the better) and as objective as possible. Objectivity is the most important criterion, followed by their analytical skills.

 

Please vote in the poll above for those you want to review contested results. Vote for all you want to sit on the panel. The five with the most votes are invited to form the review panel.:good

 

I have no issue with anyone nominated and would select them all (including PacD outside Pacquiao fights).

Brooklyn is tops for me.

 

No way PacDbest or Amsterdam (as much as I like amsterdam) should be in there. They could not be trusted to make fair decisions.

 

Only vote for those you want.

 

I did. I just dont think they should be in there, no more so than me or other posters.

 

They were nominated in the thread.:good

 

They where tongue in cheek nominations though, especially PacDBest.

Ah weel, fook it.

 

:bart

 

brooklyn, kg, sean, McGrain and sues2nd?:think

 

As were others...

Just kidding, another burden of responsibility is the last thing I need.

Good.

 

This content is protected