Eubank Sr: Benn had no guts, Hopkins/Toney/Jones have no place in MW history!

You shut up you clue less dick, he may have got up but in no way would have continued for much longer one or two more big punches from watson and he`d have been down.

Also how you call the ref a bent Brit ref is funny seeing as they were both british fighters, and also Benn had no probs with the decision and has said that Watson out fought and out thinked him. I`d rather take Benn's word than your opinion

 

It's called quitting or lack of confidence

 

thats a bit random.........

 

Nonsense, Benn never quit.

Benn was in no condition to carry on, the fight was stopped at the right time, look at the way Benn backed down off the right hand, then collapsed off the left hand

 

The only one clueless is you. You genuinely had no idea that Benn was ready to carry on. All these years you've believed something that was wrong. Don't give me that "one or two big punches" conjecture - that's exactly the kind of baseless rubbish that Brit Stoppage Apologists come out with. You should be happy to have discovered this over 20 years later.

Benn didn't cry over spilled milk - not even about the fast Brit count. So what?

 

"Benn had no guts"
:rofl:rofl:rofl Get real u plank

 

His legs looked strong and fresh when he quickly sprung up after waiting casually for the count of 10.

 

Give over will you he`d gone down from a jab after burning himself out, yeah he beat the count but was in no state to continue, if a jab sticks him to the canvas you expect him to be able to take Watson back hand????

 

Eubank is just mad because in the main scheme of things, Benn accomplished more than him.

 

Benn had enough guts to go out and fight and beat a couple of topish Americans which Mr Eubank never did for what ever reason as tough and brave as he was.

 

So we've got essexboy right & wrong and atberry wrong & right on the two separate points.

You two plonkers should explain to each other where you're right and wrong. (beat count, still wasn't finished)

 

Benn rose at 10 when he could've comfortably rose a fair few seconds earlier.

 

Your Brittard ignorance is tedious.

And you atberry - you're just deliberately dishonest sometimes.

I'm not sure which is worse...

 

Benn was better than Eubank! And dirty too, one my favorites.

 

Atberry does not agree with me on this he`s agreeing with you,unless your having a go at him about Benn being a quitter which this decussion is not about. your racial crap is WOTT especially as theres no reason to have a dig "Brittard" crap is put across when theres a US and British boxer involved in the debate , not so here.

Your firing blanks here with you racial talk, How do you think the fight would have continued then if The ref hadnt screwed the count up? also this was no so called Brit ref crap, as the ref was not looking at Benn when he counted ten complacency on the ref part. You want to talk about a bent Brit ref, Then Ian John Lewis is your man.