Fight stats for Dirrell/Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by soapysouter, Oct 18, 2009.

  1. soapysouter

    soapysouter Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    568
    Likes Received:
    0
    Im going to be surprised if Dirrell didnt land twice as many punches as froch. I know you can't judge a fight on stats, but alot of people are saying Dirrell was too negative and didnt throw enough, but without a doubt he outlanded Froch by a big big distance. Barring round 6 I struggle to think of Froch landing many clean shots.

    How long will we have to wait for the stats to be released?

    Are there even any? and will they even release them? Who are in charge of these things, If Dirrell is clearly miles ahead on the stats would it be damaging to release them now hte decision went the wrong way?

    By the way, im british and was shouting For a Froch win. Im not going to go as far as calling it a robbery, but it was a very very poor decision.
     
  2. calumbo

    calumbo Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    they wont be released as the stat count wasnt put on for the fight.

    This from dan rafael on espn.
     
  3. lastletter26

    lastletter26 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    2,856
    Likes Received:
    1
    The fight wasn't close. 7-5 dirrell at the least but I had it 8-4. Froch has no honor with his rabbit punching (his only consistent punch). Dirrell beat him easily in all criteria to score a fight. The fix was on and if you listened to those bozo commentating you would think that they were watching a different fight. Dirrell won period.
     
  4. Mr. HU

    Mr. HU KP vs BHop anniversary Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,751
    Likes Received:
    0

    I clicked on this thread cause i really want to see the fight stats myself! If you don't base a fight on stats then what exacty do you base it on?

    Dirrell out punched Froch 2-1 and out landed 2-1!
    Dirrell hurt Froch twice in the fight yet he was never hurt!
    Dirrell outboxed Froch through out the fight!

    Overall Dirrell was the better man in the ring!

    Froch fans are saying Dirrell "ran" but yet Dirrell beat Froch to the punch on damn near all of the exchanges!

    This is why boxing is fading fast!!

    Anyone who understands boxing and the BUSINESS of boxing know why Dirrell was "suppose" to lose!
     
  5. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    54,515
    Likes Received:
    121
    Dirrell's only running was when he was sliding away from the winging punches ..Funny that his fans call it running but how could he have ran all night if he was tagging Froch !!!
     
  6. Anglosaxon

    Anglosaxon FASTEST HANDS ON ESB Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2008
    Messages:
    8,521
    Likes Received:
    139

    wow, this is so stupid...

    Dirrel hurt Froch? GIF? get real noob, he never had froch hurt, and Froch's glancing blows marked his face up, Froch wasn't the one bleeding and crying to the ref.

    Boxings fading fast because of whiney bitches liek Dirrel refusing to fight and pot shotting themselves to what they hope is win, knowing full well they didn't do enough.

    Dirrel needs to be expelled from this super 6 tournament.

    :patsch
     
  7. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly.. delusional motherfxckers..
     
  8. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    0
    your a noob..?
     
  9. realshocks

    realshocks Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    106
    Nobody but nobody wants to watch fights like that. They would have to pay me to view if I knew what kind of fight it would be. The snoozefest was entirely down to Dirrell's spoiling tactics. I always thought Americans favoured action fighters, guys with 'heart', warriors - I'm stunned to see them backing up this guy for running away.
     
  10. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2007
    Messages:
    11,122
    Likes Received:
    13
    Believe me, Froch's camp will be doing anything in their power to make sure those stats aren't released. They know he got outpunched by a wide margin.
     
  11. Mr. HU

    Mr. HU KP vs BHop anniversary Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    The reason why there isn't gonna be punch stats is because everyone in boxing knows that Dirrell is far more superior in boxing skills and If the numbers come out it will be an uproar about why Froch won!!

    The BUSINESS of boxing was counting on Froch KOing a young and "green" Dirrell! Trust me the money is in Europe at SMW right now!
     
  12. valdez

    valdez Grand Champ Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,197
    Likes Received:
    0
    +1
     
  13. soapysouter

    soapysouter Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    568
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll watch re runs and release my own stats then
     
  14. realshocks

    realshocks Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    106
    Funny - I thought boxing scores counted aggression and force of punch.
     
  15. calumbo

    calumbo Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,139
    Likes Received:
    0
    dirrell hardly threw any punches bar the 10th and 11th rounds!

    He was dancing about without throwing anything for most of the middle rounds..THAT IS WHY HE LOST!!
    Had he attacked like he did in the latter rounds he would have won EASILY