Fighters whose greatness may be overrated

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GB_Boxing, Jul 11, 2017.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    Underrated by whom?
     
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,605
    Jan 30, 2014
    Yeah, I think that Duran is rated just right at 135, considerably underrated at 147, and significantly overrated above 147.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,048
    49,103
    Apr 27, 2005
    That's a reasonable comment.
     
  4. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    31,130
    38,211
    Jul 24, 2004
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,798
    52,924
    Feb 11, 2005
    I am finding Joe Frazier to be criminally underrated as of late. Despite his size, style and physical deficiencies, he had an extremely impressive stay at the top of the division, including what is arguably the greatest victory in the division's history.
     
    robert ungurean, reznick and McGrain like this.
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,671
    51,477
    Mar 21, 2007
    Georges Carpantier is the big one for me.

    I also think Marcel Cerdan gets way overrated.

    Sorry the French.
     
  7. BlackCloud

    BlackCloud I detest the daily heavyweight threads Full Member

    3,200
    3,366
    Nov 22, 2012
    Takes the gold medal.
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,973
    27,957
    Feb 15, 2006
    I agree with this pick, but one observation must be made.

    The main limiting factor, was his decision to retire, at his absolute peak.
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,596
    Nov 24, 2005
    I'll say Thomas Hearns, for the hell of it.
    His greatness is based on moving around weight divisions beating good fighters, but ...
    He was never the champ at welterweight.
    He was destroyed in 3 rounds at middleweight by the champ.
    He lost to Iran Barkley twice, once at 160, once at 175.

    His legendary status at 154 is based on beating Benitez and Duran, who were smaller guys and likewise squeezed out of welter and middle by better fighters too, like him refugees from SRL and/or Hagler domination.

    Maybe I underrate his win over Virgil Hill .... ?

    Thomas Hearns was a GREAT FIGHTER, a VERY GREAT FIGHTER, in my opinion, but he's clearly the least great of the "Fab Four".
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  10. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,517
    13,083
    Oct 12, 2013
    This content is protected
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,798
    52,924
    Feb 11, 2005
    I think people get a little over their skis on him. He is a great, no doubt. But people ranking him as even a Top 20 All Time heavyweight are just high.
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,434
    20,040
    Apr 3, 2012
    Considering his level of performance at those weights, it's very possible.
     
  13. richdanahuff

    richdanahuff Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,517
    13,083
    Oct 12, 2013
    Pryor kill Duran at 140?
     
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,434
    20,040
    Apr 3, 2012
    Primo Carnera
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  15. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,585
    9,156
    Oct 8, 2013
    I think Ken Norton is slightly overrated. He got completely bombed out against the big punchers and lost to the elite boxers outside of his razor close series with Ali.
    And I love the way he fought the way he winged his punches. I just think he tends to be overrated.
    Young could of gone either way as for Holmes I thought Holmes had it in bag by 15th