Floyd camp rejects Arum final offer

:huh

Those were disease test, not PED test.

 

Do you think you need a PHd to decipher WADA's handbook? All you do is post WADA's banned PED list, as what is banned for your sport. Then you contract a WADA certified laboratory, and ask them to check for the stuff on the list. WADA provides for certifications and protocol guidelines for labs to get accredited. Christ it ain't rocket science and it ain't any skin off NSAC's nose to follow a thorough policy.

This ain't NASA man, no one is sending the urine to the moon.

 

I didn't address their protocols at all. I expressed shock at the idea that the head of an organization is a fair and unbiased commentator on the effectiveness of that same organization.

Whether the WADA policy is sufficient is another question entirely. And the schedule of testing is yet another question outside of that. None of which is germane to my point which is: Of course the head of NSAC is going to say that the current NSAC policy is fine, he's not moronic enough to claim that his organization does a bad job.

Also, perhaps we could sidestep all of this by having the fight on the moon, where there is no boxing commission in place yet. Then we wouldn't have to send the urine there, we could just send the athletes and have them pee when they arrived.

 

i just said that in another thread, just not as nicely

 

WADA policy is the bible to the anti-doping movement. USADA, AFLD, LLND, all of them follow WADA. If WADA policy is insufficient for you... lol wut?


NSAC just said that they too follow WADA, and all you got was, 'Do you honestly expect he Commissioner of NSAC to say "our current testing regimen is inadequate"? REALLY?'

Seriously?

 

he said they use the same list as wada, and the same lab policies, but not the same testing schedule policies, and that has been the main part of the debate

 

Correct. If the USADA and WADA used identical procedures, down to the schedule and method of testing, and the NSAC followed those identical procedures, there wouldn't even be any debate. But they DON'T, which point the poster above is clearly trying to ignore. Their lab policies and list are the same, but obviously there are differences of protocol outside of that narrow scope.

 

The level of the rationalizing is phenomenal.

 

and somehow PAC FANS WILL TAKE THAT TO MEAN "FLOYD DOESN'T WANT THE FIGHT"...ITS AS SIMPLE AS A RANDOM ****ING DRUG TEST...I GET EM AT MY WORK.....THIS GUY NEEDA MAN UP N JUST SAY OK...

IT WILL BE AS SIMPLE AS TO SIT IN THE CHAIR FOR 2 MINUTES AND GIVE THE BLOOD AND GET UP AND THATS THAT....

 

You used the wrong word. I think you meant rationality.

 

No olympic gold medal for grabs, no olympic drug testing. :yep

But seriously, I just found out Haymon promotes Berto. Why isn't he trying to protect Berto from a known steroid user Shane Mosley? Why no blood testing for Mosley-Berto? Why just Manny Pacquiao? WHY JUST MANNY PACQUIAO, A BOXER WITH NO HISTORY OF STEROID USE AND HAS PASSED ALL 10 OFFICIAL DOPING TESTS?

 

pacquaio is scared he gonna get caught take the test if mayweather agreed to the ridiculous 10 million for being overweight why cant pac agree? because he know he gonna lose coward ass pac im gonna sue you thats really tough pac

 

Funny how floyd was only asking for a level playing field..pacquiao will long be remembered for ****ing this all up if it don't go down cuz he wouldn't submit to some random blood tests...what a joke he is

 

Tests or no test, Pac is botching his way out of this fight, what a coward, he is a disgrace to boxing.