And you think Paul Smith is better then all the guys 3G beat. That says everything about an irrational nuthugger like you.
Sigh. I didn't say Rosado and Kirkland are the SAME level, did I Isal. If you read it, I said they are 'nearer in level' than Lem and Kirkland. Kirkland is better than Rosado, (would be a damn fun fight... sucks it fell through. Kirkland needed a fight like that) but is closer to him than he is Lemiuex at this stage of his career, imo. Kirkland stops Rosado in 10 or so... Lem would stop Kirkland around the 5th. If you dont mind Isal, who you picking between Cotto and Kirkland? Also I wonder how many would agree with you that Kirkland and Lemiuex are the same level. I might start a poll on that. Would be interesting to me to see how many share that opinion.
Isal really can't be reasoned with. He says Kirkland is better them Lemmy, and that Paul Smith alone is better then anyone else 3G has fought. And why does he stick to those guns? Because they are simply two fighters Canelo beat. That's his motivation and reasoning.
If you only watched his fight against GGG, then maybe. But still, he is proven to be much better than Liam Smith and Kirkland. Your last paragraph is just beyond idiotic. Kirkland got KOd by a journeyman at his peak, Lemieux got KOd by a contender at the prospect stage of his career. Rubio that GGG fought is on Kirkland's level. That's a much better comprasion.
The guy who you call a shot journeyman is much better than anyone Smit beat. His only notable win to date is John Thompson, who's not a top25 guy at 154 or 160 who wouldn't make it to top5 wins of Lemieux. Your assesments make it very clear than you've never seen Smith fight before his fight with Canelo and you're just talking out of your ass.
And you claim Kirkland who was coming off of an 18 months lay off who spent his entire training camp cutting weight is a top level win. That's all we have to know about your boxing knowledge and insanity of your fanboyism.
You know Isal never heard of Paul Smith prior to facing canelo. This will give you an even better idea of where Isal comes from. He's rarely seen an Erislandy fight. His words, not mine.
meant Liam. Confused him with Ward's former opponent. The fact that you end with an 'OMG' says it all about you. too much emotion, too much drama. No wonder you come off like a insane fanboy. Take a page from Kirk's book, and try to act and sound a little more mature. You came off like a little child in your back and forth with him.
So far Isal, *every single person* has Lemiuex rated higher than Kirkland and Angulo (as opposed to you saying Lemiuex is on par with Angulo and probably worse than Kirkland) with most saying they are a distance behind him. Why do you think that is Isal? Every single person responding is a Golovkin fanboy? Or... Can you entertain the idea for a minute that maybe you are overrating Kirkland and Angulo as to make Canelo look better?
Kirkland has been KO twice, once a by someone who had no business KO a fighter like Kirkland and once by an elite fighter. Outside of that he has beat better quality opponents than Lemieux has. Lemieux has been KO twice. Once by an old shot, smaller Marco Antonio Rubio, and once by an elite fighter. Unlike Kirkland Lemieux has also been outboxed easily by a journeyman and has faced a lower level of fighters than Kirkland. If we're honest with ourselves we will admit that Kirkland has the better resume, and that there are questions that still need to be answered as far as his fighting age. Lemieux, we know everything there is to know. He can beat the C and B levels, but he can also get KO or outboxed by them. You guys really need to watch more Kirkland and Lemieux fights.