You do realize that PBF wasn't prime when he fought Maidana don't you? Or is PBF the only fighter in history who was prime his whole career? Even still you ignore the fact that he was cut early in their first fight and it bothered him he took over the second half of the fight and won the rematch going away.
Well other than the fact Paulie wasn't a sharp accurate counter puncher like Floyd was. Whether it was mosley, Pacquiao, Canelo none of them wanted to eat sharp counter rights. There is a reason fighters would wait too long vs Floyd and its because of distance and not wanting to hit with what comes back. The fact you seem to think Danny Garcia is a hard puncher compared to Floyd makes your argument null and void
cut? fighters have had worse cuts and some even broken things and won more easily Maidana from the start looked the much better fighter was dominating him maidana won that fight he got robbed the fact mayweather struggled with maidana proved that he was never that good come on maidana is limited as hell yet had so much success vs Floyd? maidana looked skilful in there lol ****ing hell freaking maidana looked like a skilful boxer the way he jabbed and slipped shots maidana lost every round to Alexandra and should of lost to a shot morales khan himself beat him more easy
It's a joke. Who the **** cares if a fighter wins the early rounds but then gets Sent to the afterlife after 6.
If you weren't so emotionally invested in Floyd you would see the argument a lil clearer. Its a style problem how ever long it lasts. Khan will land more than others down to pure speed alone, plus he can take a bit more off of Floyd than say a Maidana, Garcia. Pimp C an Team Mayweather are lucky Floyd chose wisely
Because its part of the fight, half the fight infact. If Floyd don't land the KO after 6 he will need this fight in Vegas baby cause them early rounds might comeback an haunt him
So much fail in this post I don't even know where to start. So let me get this straight PBF was never any good? Then what does that make all the guys PBF beat then? If they lost to a guy who was never any good? PBF was 37 when he fought Maidana but let me guess he was still prime right? Pac was younger than PBF and younger than 37 when he fought and got put into a coma by JMM and lost to PBF so let me say this by your logic he was no good either? It's a well known fact that Maidana got better when he got with Garcia he did wonders with Maidana and had he got with him earlier in his career he would have been a force. But let me play this game with you JMM went life and death with Pac but PBF shut JMM out and beat him much easier than Pac did. Do you see how that works?
UwotM8 ?? Khan was outboxed to a loss by Peterson. He dropped rounds and was floored against Julio Diaz. 2 judges had the Maidana fight a draw. It only took Swifty 3 rounds to figure him out and to get his timing down , and when that happened Khan was eliminated from the contest in the 4th. Brooks would out box Khan behind a stiff jab as would loads of other guys including Weather.
A lot of greats have their 'Ken Norton'. You seem to operate on the notion the better fighter,m or greater one, MUST win in a dominant fashion every single time. That's completely unrealistic.