the sanctioning bodies should implement stringest tests in and out of competition to ensure that their champions and mandatory challengers are clean. But they should implement a test that they are confident will not affect the boxer's performance or training regiment.
Right. Nothing is foolproof. We'll never be 100% sure no matter what method of drug testing is employed. That said, we'll be "more sure" than with current methods which are known to be ineffective. I'll settle for a higher level of reliability.
yer all ****in ******ed if you didnt already know that the reason it wasnt already implemented was because its costly.... and while i hear you if you say that all fighters should be subjected to it...realistically...at least all the major superfights should have it
Mayweather waits five hours.... finally he's ready to ****, you could see the regret in his eyes for demanding these tests....As the clip ends and May's in the bathroom he screams out "Manny don't want it"...
I don't care if Mayweather demanded Pac come out in a walrus suit for his ring entrance. Don't agree to something in the contract in the beginning, if you are going to have "problems with it" or not really want to do it.
over the top? yet they find a way for it to run just fine in every other area they use it in. This is not an experiment people, other sports do it or have a form of this kinda of testing. They find ways to make it work. 11,028 athletes competed in the Olympics in 2008, and they figured away to test. Money will be the big issue not implementing the test. They have to do something like fighters with TV contracts or that fight on TV must be tested, to cut down the cost.
It was unsportsmanlike but the limit was for 147 when floyd weighed in. Plus it was only 2lbs renyo. Isn't 2lbs not a big deal?