130lbs... #1. Alexis Arguello #2. Floyd Mayweather Jr. #3. Azumah Nelson #4. Flash Elorde #5. Julio Caesar Chavez 135lbs #1. Roberto Duran #2. Pernell Whitaker #3. Benny Leonard #4. Joe Gans #5. Joe Brown 140lbs #1. Julio Caesar Chavez #2. Aaron Pryor #3. Kostya Tszyu #4. Barney Ross #5. Antonio Cervantes 147lbs. #1. Sugar Ray Robinson #2. Henry Armstrong #3. Sugar Ray Leonard #4. Thomas Hearns #5. Felix Trinidad
Can the fight be a subject? :deal By the way, since boxing has subjective judging, then it is certainly open to speculation. I didn't ask you to take my decision. I merely stated an opinion. Something you cannot prove wrong. And I am not white either.
I have seen little of some of these fighters. But my criteria is using accomplishments and record along with seeing the fighter and weighing them equally. I contemplated Ike Williams and Ortiz at LW. But Brown I have a little more info on. I will continue to look for more info. (Grandfather left alot of tapes and old footage) Griffith I simply forgot. I actually have Hearns too high IMO, but I keep thinking he could beat anyone. Gavilan I don't much about. I was surprised to see what Armstrong did at WW. I thought he did more at LW, but upon further review, it seems WW was his second best weight. And I don't think Trinidad could beat most of these guys, but he defended that title ALOT and never lost at WW.
sorry but the decision had already been made, you and all thedemons in hell can't reverse the decision
Well, on the paper Trinidad never 'lost' and he defended his IBF title 15 times which is honorable considering the type of fighter he is.
Bigtime you know when you get exposed as an idiot (frequently) this is all you do, just divert with your 15 year old jokes. Didnt you win a contest here on ESB for stupidest post ever? The one about Tito Trinidad not being Latino, because he was black? Online degrees just dont teach you that kind of ****, do they?
Anyone who reads a few pages can see how you got exposed dumbass. You put Sal Sanchez as a top 130er...when he was a Featherweight...you probably listed him thinkit it would give you some cred. And Floyd beats Arturo Gatti, Corley (who lost his previous fight) and Brusseles, and that makes him a top 140. While you say Shane Mosley ISN'T a top 135 because he beat C level opponents... Floyd has ONE good and clear win at 135, and that's enough to make him a top 135 ATG...:rofl:rofl:rofl And you're too chicken **** to answer my question on DLH vs. Tito/Ike/Whitaker... CHICKEN****!!:yep You're probably the biggest joke on the forum ***time. :yep
who at 140 and 135 during his era would be favored to beat floyd:deal floyd was the baddest at each weight class he campaigned in, that's called keeping it real. something your fake charlie brown ass knows nothing about:admin mr. 1/35th indian
goddamn, does ***time9's dumbness know no bounds? This guy is ****ing ridiculous. I have a question for you bigtime9: What 5 degrees do you have, and where did you get them? Now, don't come back with 'it's none of your business', because as is plain to see, you have told us all that you have 5 degrees in the first place, so obviously you felt THAT was good enough to share with us. So how about telling us what you are so educated in :deal
Oh, so now your criteria has been further restricted to only the contemporaries of PBF? Way to judge ATG status :rofl :rofl :rofl
Who gives a **** who would be favored over who. You're talking ATG dumbess. Basically, you rank Floyd as an ATG based on WHO was in his division at the time? Wow you're a ****n ******.atsch
****in ridiculous isn't it? It changes SEVERAL times in this thread. I guess since Rocky Juarez might beat most people @ 126 today, he's an ATG 126 if we use ***TIME's criteria. Wlad Klitschko probably beats any HW today, that makes him Top 5 ATG HW!! :rofl:rofl