It's always for the money, don't delude yourself. He has to return to the boxing atm when he runs out.
One of the more hilarious things I've seen on this forum in awhile. Captures the absurdity of it all perfectly!
Then people will say, the only reason FM took the fight is because Manny was injured! Fans always front loading excuses for their hero. SMFH
You've got to be feeling dizzy all the time, huh? "smh". Dude, I read most of your posts in the Pac-discussion-threads, but that "smh" thing is really getting out of hand. Imagine, how ******ed it would sound if you wrote down the whole smh-quote.
To be fair there is certainly an argument for it. Pac is 40, holds the WBA strap and beat a young, ok, active fighter. Whilst Floyd fights ****ing Japanese children. Then again its his choice, nothing more to prove. He did bear Pac to be fair.
Omg when floyd fought that Japanese kickboxer kid it was a 3 round exhibition that don't count in the boxing record book. It wasn't even on ppv for goodness sake. Plus floyd got pay a load of money to do that. Pacquiao fought an active joke of a fighter in broner who Pacquiao fans trying to make broner look like an atg smh.
Broner is a good fighter. He just is not elite or even a B-grade fighter anymore. You don't become the youngest 4 division world champion by being a low level fighter. Broner's problem are purely his ignorance and his "the world is against me" mentality.
4 division champion by beating who? Lol. I can make an argument case that Broner best wins was against a decline paulie in a very close fight.<<<<That's not a good fighter.
1. A very post prime Floyd already dominated a very post prime Pac. 2. Literally everyone said that Pac would beat Broner in the exact manner that he won 3. Broner ain't hungry and he's a joke. 4. Floyd is retired I'm confused at the point of this post............
Broner and hungry don't belong in the same sentence. He doesn't even try to win these fights. He did the same bull**** he did when he fought Garcia.