Floyd's would-be excuse if he'll lose against Cotto...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NotAnMMAfan, Mar 5, 2012.


  1. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    it tells u that Floyd is THAT good. it would be te same odds if Floyd was fighting Bradley instead of Cotto
     
  2. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    "For some reason I stopped throwing the jab, it's not the night for the jab I guess."

    If Oscar continued to work off of the jab, he would have had the W.

    Sometimes i wonder if the fight was fixed.
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    And if he wins idiots like you will open over 100 threads about how the fight was pointless.
     
  4. boxing_RN

    boxing_RN Guest

    He mentioned his shoulder....stop lying.
     
  5. Emeritus

    Emeritus Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,109
    1
    Jan 22, 2010
    To be fair to Floyd although he is many things! I don't think he the type to make excuses.

    In any case he trains his ass off, never underestimates his opponents so what excuse is there?
     
  6. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    Oh I thought you guys liked to say Oscar was too old (34), inactive and a part time boxer/promoter
     
  7. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    he said ALMOST zero....its like 0.1...but not plain zero....:patsch:yep
     
  8. NotAnMMAfan

    NotAnMMAfan Guest

    Cotto is actually Floyd's toughest fight since Oscar so if he wins it'll enhance his ATG rankings. Maybe from number 42 to 40. That's a he'll of a jump. :thumbsup
     
  9. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    He said 'basically 0 chance', which is a long way off the realities of what 6/1 odds actually mean :lol:
     
  10. NotAnMMAfan

    NotAnMMAfan Guest

    Almost said this myself too but I know *****s are dumb so I didn't bother but thanks for clearing it up. :good
     
  11. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Mayweather won that fight clearly 10 rounds to 2 IMO.
     
  12. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    6-1 isn't anywhere close to 0. Kirkland was around that when he fought Angulo.
     
  13. Arcane

    Arcane One More Time Full Member

    15,277
    20
    Oct 23, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  14. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Really? Cleary vegas knows nothing about boxing....better yet those so called experts advising them know nothing.....6-1 odds for this fight is outrageous and its obviously built to munipulate those fight fans who know the game and understand that 3-1 odds is the more likely outcome.....people will buy the 6-1 odds, its to tempting. Gotta love Vegas......that's how I won 10k in the superbowl.
     
  15. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    i have no doubt that i believe you do but the judges at ringside basically told you that YDKSB.