Be careful, there are some truly amazing `experts` on here who will school you on how Margs is innocent !!
*******/haters are really sad to have to resort to hyping up a cheater. next you know they will pull another bs as if Floyd ducked Cotto.
If you believe that then is obvious that you do not follow boxing. If you think Floyd is a cherrypicker then what is Pac? Please i love to hear your weak replies.
Floyd is a fantastic fighter, one of THE top defensive stylists of all time. Multiple belts in mulitiple divsions are testament to how talented he truly is. But, to say he is THE best against some incredible fighters we have seen over the years ???
He is easily the best boxer in terms of skills. I don't think anyone can surpass SRR's resume but he is more skilled than him too.
Message board turf wars will drive otherwise rational men to defend the irrational. It's a strange phenomenon.
I agree some of the things he can do in the ring are amazing. Probaly the best pure defensive boxer/puncher the rings has seen. I just think that when you start saying THE best... Thats trying to cover a lot of territory...
What does Pacquiao have to do with the fact that Floyd has spent years fighting paper champs and guys with little tread left on their tires? You're just like all the other dumb sons of bitches on this forum who seem to think that everything in boxing is binary: if you disagree that Fighter A isn't the GOAT, well then you must be riding Fighter B's dick. Do the world a favor and cut your ****ing balls off.
Define best? If you talking about the number of pro fights is one thing. Longevity Skill Competition Stats I'm sure he can make a few claims from what i've listed.
BC if Floyd is a cherrypicker than Pac is much of obvious. And if you are really a boxing fan, you would've address that too but you won't bc? You are a hater and not a fan. actually more like a troll.