For the calzaghe haters.................

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FrochPascal, Dec 8, 2008.


  1. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    I agree 100%. :good
     
  2. yorkshire_boy

    yorkshire_boy Active Member Full Member

    1,014
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Well said!
     
  3. cableguy

    cableguy Active Member Full Member

    725
    112
    Jul 19, 2004
    Dont think you can really put Hopkins alongside the rest of these guys when it comes to resume either
     
  4. yorkshire_boy

    yorkshire_boy Active Member Full Member

    1,014
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    That's silly.

    Eubank, Bika, Kessler, Mitchell, Brewer, Woodall and loads of others were tough fighters. How many great fighters have strange losses to fighters you wouldn't expect them to? It takes dedication to string up a list of title defences like Calzaghe and Hopkins did, no matter who the opponents were.
     
  5. yorkshire_boy

    yorkshire_boy Active Member Full Member

    1,014
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    De La Hoya, Pavlik, Calzaghe, Tarver, Trinidad, Winky, Jermaine Taylor...... and that's just in the last 5 or so years. He's fought pretty much everyone, win or lose and always tried to avenge his losses.
     
  6. Kojiro

    Kojiro Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,641
    12
    Nov 11, 2004
    Sorry, Joe.
     
  7. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    Yes. DLH, Trinidad, Winky, and Tarver were great wins for him. I also thought he beat Taylor twice.
     
  8. Kojiro

    Kojiro Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,641
    12
    Nov 11, 2004
    Don't forget Pavlik. That **** was impressive! It was so impressive in fact that right now people think Pavlik sucks which is definitely not the case. Now that could have been a good win on Calzaghe's resume, he missed the opportunity.
     
  9. cableguy

    cableguy Active Member Full Member

    725
    112
    Jul 19, 2004
    Ok....so when hes not picking on smaller guys he's generally losing
     
  10. yorkshire_boy

    yorkshire_boy Active Member Full Member

    1,014
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Calzaghe for the most part of his career fought at a heavier weight, Tarver did all his career.
     
  11. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Keep an eye out for this poster, fellas. ^ He established himself as an objective and critical talent quite awhile ago. We need more posters like this.
     
  12. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    Anyone here knows I have defended Joe, but I still wanna see him vs dawson, and Earl johnson:hey
     
  13. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    I'd favor Calzaghe to beat: Leonard, Hearns, Haglar, and Duran @ 168. Chavez and Pac. are too small and he allready beat Hopkins before Hopkins fought, to paraphrase, "The greatest fight of my career" , against Pavlik.


    If Calz. retires undefeated his legend will grow
     
  14. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    and your a friggin idiot, of course. :yep
     
  15. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Did Otke's legend grow? Serious question, because you have to know that picking apart detail by detail a fighters accomplishments is what boxing historians do. We know this. If or when Kessler goes down, Calzaghe's legacy will be significantly damaged according to many people already.