Froch beat Taylor because he's more skilled.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Apr 28, 2009.


  1. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Tell me about it!:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  2. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Taylor isn't even that skilled and was outpointing Froch, Froch is like a 168 version of Margarito, except without the loaded gloves, I think. Someone should check his gloves.
    Froch is a KO waiting to happen, he gets hit too dam much.
     
  3. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Axe, Is Mayorga more skilled then Forrest since Mayorga won it twice? Is Rahman in the same level as Lewis in skills wise? Do you even know what skills mean in terms of a fighter?
     
  4. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    I was a crude slugger in amateurs. I can't tell you how many times I absolutely annhilated skilled, lighter guys in the ring by walking them down, making them use their legs and their wind, and when they were drained, whaling away till they caved.

    Carl Froch, dick though he is, is a fighter after my own heart: Get skull****ed by the flashy, skilled and talented fighter, and when his lungs, hands, and legs hurt from whupping on you, kick his ass.

    Good man, Cobra, good man.
     
  5. The Joker

    The Joker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,594
    0
    Jan 14, 2009
    Axe man, are yu nuts? How is it that this Robotic fool have more skills then Taylor? He does nothing better then him but conditioning.
     
  6. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    He is robotic and he has no rhythmm but as far as skill is concerned from a stylistic point of view, and given that styles win fights, he is the more skilled fighter.

    Taylor is very amateurish, but he has outstanding physical gifts. That's the difference.
     
  7. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    So, you think Mayorga fights like Froch? And what does Rahman have to do with anything? Was Taylor knocked out in one punch?

    Do you know what skills mean?

    Maybe you oughta break it down for me considering I'm so ignorant. You can start by explaining how Mayorga fights like Froch.
     
  8. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    He doesn't get hit as often as it seems, it's just that he's open for an overhand right, but has recooperetive skills, is an outstanding counterpuncher given his limited physical ability, and carries a solid punch.

    He's nothing like Margarito who is a face foward, traditional hands up, brawler who's straight up and down and had to plaster his hands to win fights.
     
  9. OPBF

    OPBF Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,821
    0
    Oct 25, 2008
    Froch was getting his ass handed to him for 8 rounds or more. Taylor got tired.

    POWER AND CONDITIONING ARE NOT SKILLS.
     
  10. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    You're observation is both disrespectful and speculative at best. It says nothing about skills.
     
  11. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Do you even know the true definition of skills?...Reading your post shows you seriously dont know what the **** you're talking about...Just spewing a whole bunch of bull****, try to use some common sense you dumb piece of ****!
     
  12. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    So far, you've said nothing to dispute my points. You just try to yell at me through a computer screen like a little *****.

    Please, Rudyard, if you wanna play, point out stylistic advantages that Taylor has over Froch.

    Tell me things that Froch did wrong or that Taylor did better.

    That's all you gotta do, but you can't....so just do me a favor and stay outta my threads.

    My boxing brain is far more sophisticated than yours.
     
  13. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Can you seriuosly ****ing read you stupid piece of ****...I'm not about to repeat myself for you shitbag...Go back throught bull**** thread you've made and dispute my post instead of coming up with this bull**** you're talking....I've said it plenty of time *******....only thing Froch has over Taylor is Heart and determination......Keep up you dumb piece of ****!
     
  14. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Okay okay......alright.

    Let me get this straight...

    Taylor is faster, has enough power to put Froch on his ass, has better reflexes, has sharper punches, has championships experience, and is much more skilled yet...

    because Froch was the bigger man, he won, despite Taylor having him beat in almost every category.

    And why did Taylor lose? Because of his conditioning which is speculative, yet untrue considering Taylor was fighting until the very end where is own lack of boxing brain and amateur skillset let him down as he was squared up, feet together in the ring, taking a beating from the slower, less compact punching, less experiences, no rhthmm having, Froch.

    That make sense to me.

    Or maybe Froch did things that made Taylor tenative, used his skillset to put Taylor in that position.

    But I guess not...

    Ha ha ha..

    Yeah I know Rudyard, you sucked his dick in 92' so you an expert.
     
  15. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009

    Is this suppose to be funny funboy?:verysad You corny son of a *****....Dispute what I said or keep on pushing *******!