FROCH new boxrec #1 Super middlweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SWAGGER, Apr 26, 2009.


  1. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    bute he beats..

    the kessler fight is 55/45 kessler IMO...

    id say hes probably no.2 at this point.
     
  2. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  3. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    :yikes:yikes:yikes

    Bodysnatcher, is that really you?!:admin

    Are you (also) (therefore) saying Froch should be rated at No.1 at SMW?
     
  4. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    #1? I don't know about that. But i'd say he's the man to beat right now.
     
  6. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    Sorry, mate, but this is dead wrong, and I'm surprised you fell into this trap, because you usually school people who make these schoolboy errors...:huh

    ...either you rate fighters on what they've achieved or you rate them on ability/talent/h2h predictions, or on a combination of all these things.

    Now, if you rate Froch on ability/talent/h2h predictions, you cannot possibly rank them higher than 2, after Kessler.

    If you rank him on what he's achieved, you cannot just go on whether he got a W or a L...you also have to look at the manner of the victory, EVEN if you assume that in itself, a win over Taylor at SMW counts for more than all the other wins Kessler or Bute got over their best opponents at SMW.

    ...so you can't, again, rank Froch higher than 2.

    I am happy with Froch fans ranking Froch at 2, because there is a decent case to be made for him beating Bute and Andrade, but I don't think that a win over Taylor, especially when you look at the manner of that win, counts for more than what Bute's achieved, for example...and I don't think I can be accused of bias here...but anyway...so, I don't think that you can rank Froch as high as 2 based on what he's already achieved...

    ...Kessler is clearly No.1 as long as all of these are still true:-

    1. He hasn't retired and is still fighting at least once a year
    2. He doesn't look worse when performing against C level fighters than would be expected of him
    3. The winner of Bute v. Andrade II ( as long as Bute doesn't lose to Green) hasn't faced an unbeaten Froch yet.

    :deal:good
     
  7. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    No, he's not. He's the man of the moment. Kessler is the man to beat, followed by Bute.:good
     
  8. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    bute he beats,confident of that.
     
  9. Decebal

    Decebal Lucian Bute Full Member

    34,525
    7
    Mar 10, 2007
    OK, mate... fair enough. I am happy with you Froch fans having your moment in the sun.

    I picked the wrong guy at the weekend, so I'm not going to argue picks for at least 29 days, or raise my eyebrows when people go overboard a bit.:good
     
  10. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    people may be going overboard,thats there perogative...

    though im a big "carl who" fan,i tend to think of myself as having a slighly more balanced view in all things "serpentesque"..

    i liken him to a modern day nigel benn,for sheer endurance,heart and the ability to actually put it on the line,boxing needs more carl whos!!!!!!!!!!
     
  11. Drofrah

    Drofrah Active Member Full Member

    813
    0
    Aug 6, 2007
    Id put him ahead of Kessler at the minute, due to activity alone, clearly not skill
     
  12. Wordup

    Wordup Big Stiff Idiot Full Member

    1,644
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    Good points made by both Decebal & Bodysnatcher. Not sure whereabouts in the top 4 I'd place him at the moment though.
     
  13. Carnage

    Carnage KingFroch Full Member

    2,502
    0
    Jan 9, 2009
    Even I would put him no.2 behind Kessler, he probably just gets ahead of Bute, not too much in it. And boxrec is a piece of **** when it comes to that, their p4p rankings is a joke!
     
  14. Bodysnatcher

    Bodysnatcher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,302
    0
    Oct 27, 2007
  15. Broxi

    Broxi Stand With Ukraine Full Member

    5,431
    312
    Oct 14, 2007
    Everyone knows boxrec rankings is a computer system, even boxrec acknowledge that the system is ****.