Froch V Calzagh - obvious but interesting

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by friend of frank, May 27, 2012.


  1. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Joe Calzage was a better fighter and fought better fighters. Jermaine Taylor, Andre Dirrell, Aurthur Abraham none of these are proven solid middle weights.

    Joe Calzaghes 8 best wins, are better than Carl Frochs 8 best wins. Jermaine Taylor was a no mark at super middle weight, and so was Arthur Abraham, they had did nothing at the weight. It's like Usain Bolt moving up to 400m, he has done **** all over that distance, so he is a no mark. I dont care what he has done 100 and 200.

    People just don't like Joe Calzaghe because he was a winner. Carl Froch is the underdog, he is slow, looks like he is crap, has no technical flare, but he is mighty determined. The british public love that, Carl Froch should lose more big fights than he wins. He was getting beat by Jermaine Taylor before his stamina had him fading bad, he look clueless against Andre Dirrell, clueless against Andre Ward.

    Joe Calzaghe has never looked clueless never ever been out classed, never ever been out fought, or even out thought.

    The Bernard Hopkins that Joe Calzaghe beat and forced to act and fake low blows to take a rest. Abusers all of Carl Froches opponents, ohh infact at 46 years old he beat Jean Pascal who is Carl Froch's best win, because over time Jean Pascal has been tried and tested.

    Chris Eubank another fighter who would abuse all Carl Frochs best wins.

    And are people ignoring the fact that Carl Froch was beaten by Kesseler, a fighter who Joe Calzaghe beat and took his 0, and virginity.

    Look at froch's resume, and tell me the proven super middleweights he has beaten? Or fighters at above the weight.

    Bute and Jean Pascal where the only proven fighters. Well Jean Pascal has proved himself and has been tried and tested over time.

    Andre Dirrell? Is a complete ******, apart from being unbeaten when he fought Froch.....he was a no mark. Guys like Bryon Mitchell, and Charles Brewer tried and tested fighters who Joe Calzaghe beat, yet again are proof of Calzaghes better resume.

    Carl Froch is a over achiever, he should be a loser. But with determination and toughness and solid basic ability, he wins fights. But anybody really elite who is tried and tested, I doubt he will ever beat these kind if fighters....unless their old and ****ed up or injured.

    I don't think he beats real elite special fighters. He lost to Kessler, and he lost and looked clueless against ward. He has not beaten many tried and tested fighters who are ether still young enough to be considered.

    Joe Calzaghe never look clueless, was never out fought, never out thought, you wanted a fight?he rumbled, you wanted to box? He boxed you, and beat you at this game.

    We love losers the brave loser in this country, and the fact of the matter is. Carl Froch should be a loser, everything down on paper suggests he should be average fighter.....but he has found a way to bend sport science.

    Joe Calzaghe was a handsome guy, his ability was also handsome. His speed, his immense work rate, his tendency to want a scrap. And he never lost, we don't like winners............we are a nation of losers mentally.

    Just look at the olympic build up, it's ****ing pathetic.
     
  2. tommyd107

    tommyd107 Gambler Full Member

    1,156
    0
    Jul 22, 2011
    above post spot on!
     
  3. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    Outstanding post and spot on as well. Nothing more can be added to that.
     
  4. Love the post PK.

    Charles Brewer though.... needed a come from behind stoppage to beat a 200 year old Herol Graham.
     
  5. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    absolutely spot on from PK there. Quality post.
     
  6. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Thanks..:good
     
  7. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Sound Man..:good
     
  8. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Tar man...:good
     
  9. Dean

    Dean Active Member Full Member

    757
    4
    Apr 20, 2010




    :tired

    its easy to skew someones resume when you are blinded by your own opinion.
     
  10. Dean

    Dean Active Member Full Member

    757
    4
    Apr 20, 2010
    bika could beat froch??? u havin a laugh?
     
  11. Dean

    Dean Active Member Full Member

    757
    4
    Apr 20, 2010


    bute was the man?
     
  12. kosaros

    kosaros Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,593
    5
    Jul 21, 2008
    Says the man with the Carl Froch avatar...
     
  13. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    You're lucky.

    I was in the process of doing a mammoth reply but my boss walked in and I clicked off.

    I will do it again, later. It will own you.
     
  14. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
  15. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    Friend of Frank, just pmed me and asked me weather? I want this thread title changing to my username.

    Because I have just owned it mate, go and ****ing do you're reply. I will come back with something esle....