Oh dear popkins, at least your inane ramblings serve some purpose, such as the dangers of drug abuse to children, and the dangers of entering into boxing debate with Team Elite on ESB, both of which have left you a quivering mess :-(
:rofl:rofl:rofl i don't think it's a possibility, but a fact! that you are the biggest clown on any boxing forum on the planet. you're a joke of the highest order. and a troll. i'm really sorry that joe was ****ing your sister and your mother in a three way when you came walking in through the front door, and you're really angry at the italian stallion... but give it a ****ing rest!
the same calzaghe that faced hopkins, is the same calzaghe that faced kessler. you know, the guy who was in his prime and was clearly beat by joe. the guy when past his best beat a prime carl froch. you two are obvious trolls. :deal
There won't be accumulative pressure. Joe would control the action, and maybe land a marginally low blow in the 10th that would make Froch think about quitting.
The **** are all you clowns talking about? Calzaghe would box the **** out of Froch and win a clear and pretty wide UD. His speed was too much, his chin was too tough, his workrate was too high and his conditioning was too good for Froch to look any good against him. Hell will freeze over a million times before Calzaghe knocks out Froch, though.
I think Froch is a bit too straight up and Calzaghe had a good chin and was tireless. It'd be like the Dirrell fight, except Calzaghe winning and not fighting like a *** like Andre did.